Literature DB >> 11491257

Intravascular ultrasound-guided renal artery stenting.

G Dangas1, J R Laird, R Mehran, A J Lansky, G S Mintz, M B Leon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing renal artery stenting with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance and compare measurements between IVUS and angiography.
METHODS: One hundred thirty-one patients (71 women; mean age 71 +/- 8 years) underwent IVUS-guided Palmaz stent implantation in 153 stenotic renal arteries at a single center. The indications for stenting were uncontrolled hypertension (102, 77.9%), renal insufficiency (10, 7.6%), and both conditions (19, 14.5%). The majority of lesions were ostial (114, 74.5%); the remainder occupied the proximal renal artery (39, 25.5%). The mean lesion length and diameter stenosis were 6.5 +/- 3.0 mm and 74% +/- 10%, respectively, as measured by angiography. Data were recorded in a prespecified database; angiographic and IVUS images were analyzed at dedicated core laboratories and compared.
RESULTS: Angiographic success was achieved in all patients, but IVUS indicated the need for additional intervention in 36 (23.5%) cases. There was strong correlation between the angiographic and IVUS measurements of lesion length (r = 0.60, p < 0.0001) and pre-/postprocedural minimal luminal diameter (r = 0.72 and 0.63, respectively; p < 0.0001). The mean contrast volume was 74 +/- 18 mL per case. In-hospital renal failure occurred in 8 (6.1%) patients; 2 (1.5%) required transient hemodialysis. At a mean 15-month follow-up, patients were treated with fewer antihypertensive medications (p = 0.05), and systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressures had decreased (p = 0.001); no significant change was noted in serum creatinine.
CONCLUSIONS: IVUS-guided stenting facilitates safe renal artery revascularization. IVUS imaging may complement angiography in certain cases, which should be studied further in prospective studies with iodinated or noniodinated contrast agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11491257     DOI: 10.1177/152660280100800302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  5 in total

1.  Restoration of renal allograft function via reduced-contrast percutaneous revascularization of transplant renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Phillip A Erwin; Sachin S Goel; Surafel Gebreselassie; Mehdi H Shishehbor
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2015-02-01

Review 2.  Update on intervention versus medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Albeir Y Mousa; Ali F AbuRahma; Joseph Bozzay; Mike Broce; Mark Bates
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  The association between renal atherosclerotic plaque characteristics and renal function before and after renal artery intervention.

Authors:  Takuro Takumi; Verghese Mathew; Gregory W Barsness; Tetsuro Kataoka; Ronen Rubinshtein; Charanjit S Rihal; Rajiv Gulati; Eric Eeckhout; Ryan J Lennon; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Association of plaque composition and vessel remodeling in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: a comparison with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Tetsuro Kataoka; Verghese Mathew; Ronen Rubinshtein; Charanjit S Rihal; Ryan Lennon; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-03

Review 5.  How to diagnose, how to treat: renal artery stenosis-diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Tudor D Vagaonescu; George Dangas
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.