Literature DB >> 11491190

Measuring quality of life in evaluating clinical interventions: an overview.

P Kind1.   

Abstract

Health professionals provide care with some purpose in mind. It is reasonable to assume that they are therefore interested in observing and measuring health outcomes. In the recent past, it has become fashionable to describe health outcomes in terms of their impact on 'quality of life', a widely used term that is usually left undefined. Measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are now in common usage in clinical studies. The construction of both generic and condition-specific measures of HRQoL relies heavily on the choice of descriptive domains, a process that often reflects the personal values of the developer of the instrument. Subjective valuation is a recurring phenomenon in the construction and application of HRQoL measures. These values should not be restricted to the private judgement of the clinician alone. The challenge for those evaluating clinical interventions is to make such values explicit and to extend the franchise to society as a whole.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11491190     DOI: 10.3109/07853890109002085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Med        ISSN: 0785-3890            Impact factor:   4.709


  8 in total

1.  Mapping analyses to estimate health utilities based on responses to the OM8-30 Otitis Media Questionnaire.

Authors:  Helen Dakin; Stavros Petrou; Mark Haggard; Sarah Benge; Ian Williamson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Mapping analyses to estimate EQ-5D utilities and responses based on Oxford Knee Score.

Authors:  Helen Dakin; Alastair Gray; David Murray
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Determinants of the quality of life (QoL) in patients with an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD).

Authors:  F Godemann; C Butter; F Lampe; M Linden; S Werner; S Behrens
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  The Bandim TBscore--reliability, further development, and evaluation of potential uses.

Authors:  Frauke Rudolf
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.640

5.  Ten-year patient-reported outcomes following total and minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  Edward Burn; Maria T Sanchez-Santos; Hemant G Pandit; Thomas W Hamilton; Alexander D Liddle; David W Murray; Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Telephone reliability of the Frenchay Activity Index and EQ-5D amongst older adults.

Authors:  Steven McPhail; Paul Lane; Trevor Russell; Sandra G Brauer; Steven Urry; Jan Jasiewicz; Peter Condie; Terry Haines
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Comparison of the discriminative ability of a generic and a condition-specific OHRQoL measure in adolescents with and without normative need for orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Eduardo Bernabé; Cesar M de Oliveira; Aubrey Sheiham
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Impact evaluation and association with EuroQol 5D health-related utility values in Ménière's disease.

Authors:  Ilmari Pyykkő; Vinaya Manchaiah; Hilla Levo; Erna Kentala
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-11-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.