PURPOSE: Clinically undetectable micrometastases may account for disease recurrence in breast cancer patients after variable disease-free intervals. However, little is known about the cellular mechanisms controlling human breast cancer micrometastases. We compared tumor proliferation rate, apoptotic index, and angiogenesis in human breast cancer micrometastases with those of macroscopic axillary lymph node metastases. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Seven breast cancer micrometastases (<2 mm) obtained from the sentinel nodes of seven patients were compared with 13 macrometastases (lymph node replaced with tumor) obtained from 13 patients. The tissue was fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, serially sectioned, and evaluated by H&E and immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin. Tumor proliferation rate was assessed as the number of Ki-67-positive nuclei/total number of tumor nuclei. Tumor vascularity was quantified using antibody to factor VIII to identify microvessels per high-power field (at x400). Apoptosis was quantified using the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Tdt)-mediated nick end labeling method. Results were analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: Median size of micrometastases was 0.5 mm (range, 0.4-1.0), and the median number of tumor nuclei/section was 143 (range, 90-312). Median proliferation rate for macrometastases was greater than for micrometastases (35% versus 12%; P = 0.003). Median microvessel density/high-power field for macrometastases was greater than for micrometastases (17 versus 1; P < 0.001). There was no difference in apoptotic index between macrometastases and micrometastases (1.1% versus 0.7%; P = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Human breast cancer micrometastases have lower tumor proliferation rates and angiogenesis than breast cancer macrometastases. These characteristics may explain their differential growth patterns.
PURPOSE: Clinically undetectable micrometastases may account for disease recurrence in breast cancerpatients after variable disease-free intervals. However, little is known about the cellular mechanisms controlling humanbreast cancer micrometastases. We compared tumor proliferation rate, apoptotic index, and angiogenesis in humanbreast cancer micrometastases with those of macroscopic axillary lymph node metastases. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Seven breast cancer micrometastases (<2 mm) obtained from the sentinel nodes of seven patients were compared with 13 macrometastases (lymph node replaced with tumor) obtained from 13 patients. The tissue was fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, serially sectioned, and evaluated by H&E and immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin. Tumor proliferation rate was assessed as the number of Ki-67-positive nuclei/total number of tumor nuclei. Tumor vascularity was quantified using antibody to factor VIII to identify microvessels per high-power field (at x400). Apoptosis was quantified using the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Tdt)-mediated nick end labeling method. Results were analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: Median size of micrometastases was 0.5 mm (range, 0.4-1.0), and the median number of tumor nuclei/section was 143 (range, 90-312). Median proliferation rate for macrometastases was greater than for micrometastases (35% versus 12%; P = 0.003). Median microvessel density/high-power field for macrometastases was greater than for micrometastases (17 versus 1; P < 0.001). There was no difference in apoptotic index between macrometastases and micrometastases (1.1% versus 0.7%; P = not significant). CONCLUSIONS:Humanbreast cancer micrometastases have lower tumor proliferation rates and angiogenesis than breast cancer macrometastases. These characteristics may explain their differential growth patterns.
Authors: Min Jung Jo; Ji Yeon Park; Joon Seon Song; Myeong-Cherl Kook; Keun Won Ryu; Soo-Jeong Cho; Jun Ho Lee; Byung-Ho Nam; Eun Kyung Hong; Il Ju Choi; Young-Woo Kim Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Khue G Nguyen; Maura R Vrabel; Siena M Mantooth; Jared J Hopkins; Ethan S Wagner; Taylor A Gabaldon; David A Zaharoff Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Sharareh Siamakpour-Reihani; Joseph Caster; Desh Bandhu Nepal; Andrew Courtwright; Eleanor Hilliard; Jerry Usary; David Ketelsen; David Darr; Xiang Jun Shen; Cam Patterson; Nancy Klauber-Demore Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-06-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michael Retsky; Romano Demicheli; William Hrushesky; John Speer; Douglas Swartzendruber; Robert Wardwell Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2004-12-17 Impact factor: 6.466