Literature DB >> 11489710

Intermittent androgen deprivation: update of cycling characteristics in patients without clinically apparent metastatic prostate cancer.

G D Grossfeld1, U B Chaudhary, D M Reese, P R Carroll, E J Small.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To update the cycling characteristics and patterns of treatment in patients receiving intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) for clinically localized and recurrent prostate cancer.
METHODS: We report our experience with 61 patients treated with IAD. Thirty-four patients had received no prior treatment, and 27 had developed recurrent disease after previous local therapy. No patient had clinically apparent metastatic disease before the initiation of therapy. The mean and median serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level before treatment was 25.3 ng/mL and 16.0 ng/mL, respectively (range 0.5 to 190 ng/mL). For each cycle, androgen deprivation was continued until PSA became undetectable or a nadir level was reached. Patients were then observed without treatment, and therapy was reinstituted after the serum PSA value reached a predetermined level. Patients were no longer eligible to cycle off treatment when their serum PSA increased despite ongoing androgen deprivation or if any objective evidence of disease progression was present on imaging studies.
RESULTS: Follow-up ranged from 7 to 60 months (mean 30) from the start of treatment. Patients received from one to five treatment cycles (median two), with a median cycle length of 14 months. The median nadir serum PSA level during androgen deprivation was 0.01 ng/mL and was reached within an average of 6 months (range 4 to 9) after beginning treatment. Patients spent an average of 45% of the time not receiving therapy, but the time off therapy decreased as the number of treatment cycles increased. Five patients (8.1%) demonstrated progressive disease, with a median time to progression of 48 months. When examining the cycling characteristics of these patients, no consistent pattern of failure emerged.
CONCLUSIONS: IAD appears to be a viable treatment option in select patients with localized prostate cancer. With each consecutive cycle, the amount of time the patient was not receiving therapy decreased, despite achieving a low nadir PSA. Longer follow-up with more patients failing IAD will be required before clear patterns of failure emerge in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11489710     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01114-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients with locally confined prostate cancer: association of prostatic citrate and metabolic atrophy with time on hormone deprivation therapy, PSA level, and biopsy Gleason score.

Authors:  Ullrich G Mueller-Lisse; Mark G Swanson; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Personalizing Androgen Suppression for Prostate Cancer Using Mathematical Modeling.

Authors:  Yoshito Hirata; Kai Morino; Koichiro Akakura; Celestia S Higano; Kazuyuki Aihara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Hormonal therapy in prostate cancer: historical approaches.

Authors:  E David Crawford
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

4.  A 16-year clinical experience with intermittent androgen deprivation for prostate cancer: oncological results.

Authors:  Dominique Prapotnich; Xavier Cathelineau; François Rozet; Eric Barret; Annick Mombet; Nathalie Cathala; Rafael E Sanchez-Salas; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Intermittent versus continuous androgen suppression for prostatic cancer.

Authors:  P D Conti; A N Atallah; H Arruda; B G O Soares; R P El Dib; T J Wilt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.