OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of a modified technique of apical dissection during radical retropubic prostatectomy on the occurrence of positive surgical margins (PSMs). METHODS:Between 1992 and 1998, 212 nonconsecutive patients with localized prostate cancer (57 T1, 155 T2) underwentradical retropubic prostatectomy and were divided into two groups: group 1, 85 patients who underwent surgery before January 1994; and group 2, 127 patients who underwent surgery with the modification of the apical dissection after January 1994. The modified technique consisted of a wide excision of periprostatic soft tissue at the apex, including the bilateral neurovascular bundles. The clinical data (age, prostate-specific antigen, clinical staging) and pathologic findings (pathologic staging, Gleason score, PSM rate) of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the median prostate-specific antigen level (10.8 ng/mL and 9.5 ng/mL), Gleason score, and pathologic staging. Overall, the PSM rate was 53% in group 1 and 20.5% in group 2 (P <0.001). The number of PSMs decreased 2.6-fold in group 2. The PSM rate was significantly reduced at the apex with the new technique (group 1, 33.3%; group 2, 7.7%; P = 0.008). The PSM rate expressed with the odds ratio was 4.4-fold lower for patients in group 2 than for those in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: The modified apical dissection in radical retropubic prostatectomy significantly improves the PSM rate in patients with localized T1-T2 prostate cancer.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of a modified technique of apical dissection during radical retropubic prostatectomy on the occurrence of positive surgical margins (PSMs). METHODS: Between 1992 and 1998, 212 nonconsecutive patients with localized prostate cancer (57 T1, 155 T2) underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and were divided into two groups: group 1, 85 patients who underwent surgery before January 1994; and group 2, 127 patients who underwent surgery with the modification of the apical dissection after January 1994. The modified technique consisted of a wide excision of periprostatic soft tissue at the apex, including the bilateral neurovascular bundles. The clinical data (age, prostate-specific antigen, clinical staging) and pathologic findings (pathologic staging, Gleason score, PSM rate) of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the median prostate-specific antigen level (10.8 ng/mL and 9.5 ng/mL), Gleason score, and pathologic staging. Overall, the PSM rate was 53% in group 1 and 20.5% in group 2 (P <0.001). The number of PSMs decreased 2.6-fold in group 2. The PSM rate was significantly reduced at the apex with the new technique (group 1, 33.3%; group 2, 7.7%; P = 0.008). The PSM rate expressed with the odds ratio was 4.4-fold lower for patients in group 2 than for those in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: The modified apical dissection in radical retropubic prostatectomy significantly improves the PSM rate in patients with localized T1-T2 prostate cancer.