Literature DB >> 11489685

Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy minimizes warm ischemia.

K Kercher1, D Dahl, R Harland, R Blute, K Gallagher, D Litwin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Traditional open donor nephrectomy is associated with good donor outcomes and excellent allograft function. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy may accomplish these same goals with less morbidity. We report our initial experience with hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy using a commercially available hand-assist device.
METHODS: Donor and allograft outcomes for the first 30 patients undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in our institution were prospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was successfully completed in 29 (97%) of 30 donors. Organ dissection was carried out purely laparoscopically. Vessel division and allograft extraction were performed using a hand-assisted technique. The average operative time was 275 minutes (range 193 to 360), with an estimated blood loss of 99 mL (range 50 to 300). Pneumoperitoneum was consistently maintained during the hand-assisted portion of the procedure. The mean warm ischemic time was 72.5 seconds (range 30 to 165). On average, the regular diet was resumed after 2.2 days (range 1 to 3), and patients were discharged home 3.4 days (range 2 to 5) after surgery. Eight minor complications occurred in the donor group. Immediate graft function occurred in all 30 cases. No ureteral complications occurred. The recipient creatinine levels ranged from 0.6 to 2.4 mg/dL at an average follow-up of 11.5 months (range 1 to 23).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is technically feasible and can be performed with minimal morbidity. Hand-assisted kidney extraction may help to facilitate immediate allograft function by minimizing the warm ischemic time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11489685     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01194-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

1.  Warm ischemia time does not correlate with recipient graft function in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  M M Buzdon; E Cho; S C Jacobs; B Jarrell; J L Flowers
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  HandPort Laparoscopic Surgery-Review and Current Status.

Authors:  Amit Goel
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  [The hand assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy].

Authors:  A Hamza; A Jurczok; O Rettkowski; K Fischer; P Fornara
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Effect of robotic assistance on the "learning curve" for laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  S Horgan; C Galvani; M V Gorodner; G R Jacobsen; F Moser; A Manzelli; J Oberholzer; M P Fisichella; D Bogetti; G Testa; H N Sankary; E Benedetti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  J-C Kang; M-H Chung; P-C Chao; C-C Yeh; C-W Hsiao; T-Y Lee; S-W Jao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Objective assessment comparing hand-assisted and conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  V Datta; S Bann; J Hernandez; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a single centre experience.

Authors:  Tomasz Jakimowicz; Michał Macech; Amro Alsharabi; Łukasz Romanowski; Tadeusz Grochowiecki; Dorota Lewandowska; Piotr Kaliciński; Magdalena Durlik; Leszek Pączek; Sławomir Nazarewski
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 1.195

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.