Literature DB >> 11489575

Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in different types of posterior capsule opacification.

C Y Cheng1, M Y Yen, S J Chen, S C Kao, W M Hsu, J H Liu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity in 2 types of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) in pseudophakic eyes before and after neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy and to evaluate vision test results after Nd:YAG capsulotomy.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
METHODS: Fourteen eyes with fibrosis-type PCO and 15 eyes with Elschnig-pearl-type PCO were enrolled prospectively. Before and 1 week after Nd:YAG capsulotomy, VA and contrast sensitivity were assessed using the illiterate E version of the Bailey-Lovie chart and the Vistech VCTS 6000 chart, respectively.
RESULTS: Before capsulotomy, the mean logMAR acuity in the group with Elschnig-pearl-type PCO was 0.47 +/- 0.32 (SD) and in the group with fibrosis-type PCO, 0.17 +/- 0.07. The difference between the 2 groups was significant (P =.002). After capsulotomy, there was no significant between-group difference (P >.05). Before capsulotomy, the contrast sensitivity was significantly worse (P <.01) at all spatial frequencies in the group with pearl-type PCO, especially at 6 cycles per degree. After capsulotomy, there was no significant between-group difference (P >.05) at any spatial frequency.
CONCLUSIONS: After cataract surgery, patients with pearl-type PCO had lower VA and contrast sensitivity than those with fibrosis-type PCO. An Nd:YAG capsulotomy improved the VA and contrast sensitivity in patients with both types of PCO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11489575     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00867-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  8 in total

1.  Systems of analysis of posterior capsule opacification.

Authors:  T M Aslam; B Dhillon; N Werghi; A Taguri; A Wadood
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Vision function of pseudophakic eyes with posterior capsular opacification under different speed and spatial frequency.

Authors:  Ziyuan Liu; Zhiqiang Hou; Shan Ge; Honglei Pang; Wei Wang
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Posterior capsule morphology determinants of visual function.

Authors:  Tariq Mehmood Aslam; Peter Aspinall; Baljean Dhillon
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  A freely accessible, evidence based, objective system of analysis of posterior capsular opacification; evidence for its validity and reliability.

Authors:  Tariq M Aslam; Niall Patton; Jim Graham
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Intraocular lens-edge design and material factors contributing to posterior-capsulotomy rates: comparing Hoya FY60aD, PY60aD, and AcrySof SN60WF.

Authors:  Peter J Morgan-Warren; Jm Alaric Smith
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-22

6.  Optical coherence tomography for an in-vivo study of posterior-capsule-opacification types and their influence on the total-pulse energy required for Nd:YAG capsulotomy: a case series.

Authors:  Gregor Hawlina; Darko Perovšek; Brigita Drnovšek-Olup; Janez MoŽina; Peter Gregorčič
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Posterior capsular opacification comparison between morphology and objective visual function.

Authors:  Chengzhe Lu; Shasha Yu; Hui Song; Yun Zhao; Shiyong Xie; Xin Tang; Xiaoyong Yuan
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.209

8.  Methods of assessment of patients for Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy that correlate with final visual improvement.

Authors:  Tariq M Aslam; Niall Patton
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 2.209

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.