Literature DB >> 11489041

The potential influence of small group processes on guideline development.

C Pagliari1, J Grimshaw, M Eccles.   

Abstract

The authors discuss the important and often neglected role of psychosocial factors in guideline development. Such factors can influence the process by which guideline development groups interact, make decisions and achieve consensus, which may have important implications for the validity and reliability of the recommendations they produce. Particular attention is paid to the role of social influence within multidisciplinary groups and the importance of good chairmanship. Recommendations for participants, chairmen and guideline development bodies are given.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11489041     DOI： 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00272.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN： 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  21 in total

1.  Assessing the process and outcome of the development of practice guidelines and recommendations: PANELVIEW instrument development.

Authors:  Wojtek Wiercioch; Elie A Akl; Nancy Santesso; Yuan Zhang; Rebecca L Morgan; Juan José Yepes-Nuñez; Sérgio Kowalski; Tejan Baldeh; Reem A Mustafa; Kaja-Triin Laisaar; Ulla Raid; Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta; Alonso Carrasco-Labra; Matthew Ventresca; Ignacio Neumann; Maicon Falavigna; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Gian Paolo Morgano; Jan Brożek; Meghan McConnell; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Developing clinical practice guidelines: target audiences, identifying topics for guidelines, guideline group composition and functioning and conflicts of interest.

Authors:  Martin P Eccles; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Paul Shekelle; Holger J Schünemann; Steven Woolf
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Algorithm development for corticosteroid management in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis trial using consensus methodology.

Authors:  Norman T Ilowite; Christy I Sandborg; Brian M Feldman; Alexi Grom; Laura E Schanberg; Edward H Giannini; Carol A Wallace; Rayfel Schneider; Kathleen Kenney; Beth Gottlieb; Philip J Hashkes; Lisa Imundo; Yukiko Kimura; Bianca Lang; Michael Miller; Diana Milojevic; Kathleen M O'Neil; Marilynn Punaro; Natasha Ruth; Nora G Singer; Richard K Vehe; James Verbsky; Amy Woodward; Lawrence Zemel
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.054

4.  WikiBuild: a new online collaboration process for multistakeholder tool development and consensus building.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Flora T Wan; David Newton; Onil K Bhattacharyya; Mark H Chignell; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Conducting online expert panels: a feasibility and experimental replicability study.

Authors:  Dmitry Khodyakov; Susanne Hempel; Lisa Rubenstein; Paul Shekelle; Robbie Foy; Susanne Salem-Schatz; Sean O'Neill; Margie Danz; Siddhartha Dalal
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  A method for studying decision-making by guideline development groups.

Authors:  Benjamin Gardner; Rosemary Davidson; John McAteer; Susan Michie
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Introducing patient perspective in health technology assessment at the local level.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Dolorès Lepage-Savary; Johanne Gagnon; Michèle St-Pierre; Chantale Simard; Marc Rhainds; Renald Lemieux; François-Pierre Gauvin; Marie Desmartis; France Légaré
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Human computation as a new method for evidence-based knowledge transfer in Web-based guideline development groups: proof of concept randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Annemie Heselmans; Bert Aertgeerts; Peter Donceel; Stijn Van de Velde; Peter Vanbrabant; Dirk Ramaekers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Appropriateness of acute admissions and last in-patient day for patients with long term neurological conditions.

Authors:  Christina L Hammond; Margaret F Phillips; Lorraine L Pinnington; Benedict J Pearson; Apostolos Fakis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Provincial prenatal record revision: a multiple case study of evidence-based decision-making at the population-policy level.

Authors:  Nancy Edwards; Sonia Semenic; Shahirose Premji; Phyllis Montgomery; Beverly Williams; Joanne Olson; Omaima Mansi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 2.655
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.