Literature DB >> 11488862

Migration of osteoblastic cells on various guided bone regeneration membranes.

T Takata1, H L Wang, M Miyauchi.   

Abstract

To evaluate the biological effects of guided bone regeneration (GBR) barrier materials on osteoblastic cell migration, migration of mouse osteoprogenitor cells (MC3T3-E1) was examined, in vitro, on various membranes. Eight commercially available GBR membranes - bovine type I collagen (BioMend; BM), porcine type I collagen (BioGide; BG), bovine type I atelocollagen (Tissue Guide; TG), polylactic acid (Epi-Guide; EG), co-polymer of polylactic acid and polyglycolic acid (Resolute; RL, Resolut XT; RL-XT), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE; Gore Tex; GT) and co-polymer of cellulose acetate and nitrocellulose (Millipore filter; MP) - were tested. A 3x5 mm section of the membrane was fixed to the bottom of a culture dish with double-sided adhesive tape, and half of the membrane was closely covered by PARAFILM (American National Can) to leave an unexposed area for cell migration. The border between exposed and unexposed areas was marked as a baseline of cell migration. Membranes were then plated with 3 ml of cell suspension at an initial density of 1x105 cells/ml in alpha-MEM culture medium with 10% fetal bovine serum and ascorbic acid. After a 5-hour incubation, non-attached cells were completely washed out with phosphate buffered saline and the PARAFILM cover was removed. After 3 days cultivation, specimens were fixed with 10% buffered formalin and stained briefly with hematoxylin. The area of cell migration on a membrane was analyzed using a LA 500 Image Analysis System and migration area per unit length of the baseline (mm2/mm) was compared among membranes. Results demonstrated that cell migration was greater in the order: RL>RL-XT, BM, TG, MP>EG, BG. Membranes except for BG, EG and GT showed the migration rate equal to or higher than a plastic culture cover slip (Celldesk) (P<0.01) on which cells generally grow favorably. Only a small number of the cells attached to GT, and the net cell migration for the membrane could not be determined. These results indicate that GBR barrier materials per se may influence the process of bone regeneration in vivo through the effects of their presence on cell migration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11488862     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012004332.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  25 in total

1.  Osteoblast proliferation and differentiation on a barrier membrane in combination with BMP2 and TGFβ1.

Authors:  Richard J Miron; Nikola Saulacic; Daniel Buser; Tateyuki Iizuka; Anton Sculean
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A new laboratory model using bull and boar spermatozoa and fluorescent beads to assess a membrane's occlusive potential.

Authors:  M Szellö; F Janett; C Ewald; M Music; B Sener; T Attin; P R Schmidlin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Toward guided tissue and bone regeneration: morphology, attachment, proliferation, and migration of cells cultured on collagen barrier membranes. A systematic review.

Authors:  Jan Behring; Rüdiger Junker; X Frank Walboomers; Betsy Chessnut; John A Jansen
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  Enhanced Bone Repair by Guided Osteoblast Recruitment Using Topographically Defined Implant.

Authors:  Jeong-Kee Yoon; Hong Nam Kim; Suk Ho Bhang; Jung-Youn Shin; Jin Han; Wan-Geun La; Gun-Jae Jeong; Seokyung Kang; Ju-Ro Lee; Jaesur Oh; Min Sung Kim; Noo Li Jeon; Byung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Translating Periosteum's Regenerative Power: Insights From Quantitative Analysis of Tissue Genesis With a Periosteum Substitute Implant.

Authors:  Shannon R Moore; Céline Heu; Nicole Y C Yu; Renee M Whan; Ulf R Knothe; Stefan Milz; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 6.940

6.  A new method using insert-based systems (IBS) to improve cell behavior study on flexible and rigid biomaterials.

Authors:  Charlotte Grenade; Nicolas Moniotte; Eric Rompen; Alain Vanheusden; Amélie Mainjot; Marie-Claire De Pauw-Gillet
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.058

7.  Behavior of osteoblasts on TI surface with two different coating designed for orthodontic devices.

Authors:  Leonardo Fleischmann; Adriano Crismani; Frank Falkensammer; Hans-Peter Bantleon; Xiaohui Rausch-Fan; Oleh Andrukhov
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Guided bone regeneration in standardized calvarial defects using beta-tricalcium phosphate and collagen membrane: a real-time in vivo micro-computed tomographic experiment in rats.

Authors:  Sundar Ramalingam; Abdulaziz Al-Rasheed; Aws ArRejaie; Nasser Nooh; Mohammed Al-Kindi; Khalid Al-Hezaimi
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.634

9.  Modulating human connective tissue progenitor cell behavior on cellulose acetate scaffolds by surface microtextures.

Authors:  Eun Jung Kim; Cynthia A Boehm; Aaron J Fleischman; George F Muschler; Yordan V Kostov; Shuvo Roy
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Bone Regeneration Using PEVAV/β-Tricalcium Phosphate Composite Scaffolds in Standardized Calvarial Defects: Micro-Computed Tomographic Experiment in Rats.

Authors:  Mohammed Badwelan; Mohammed Alkindi; Osama Alghamdi; Abeer Ahmed; Sundar Ramalingam; Ali Alrahlah
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.