Literature DB >> 11488790

Randomized study comparing cardiac response in endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

P W Cuypers1, M Gardien, J Buth, C H Peels, J A Charbon, W C Hop.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim was to compare the cardiac response and the incidence of adverse cardiac events during and after endovascular (EVAR) and open (OR) repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).
METHODS: Seventy-six patients with an AAA suitable for EVAR, and in a general condition allowing open surgery were randomized to EVAR (57 patients) or OR (19 patients). The analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. Haemodynamic variables were assessed intraoperatively before, during and after aortic occlusion. During the procedure myocardial ischaemia was identified with use of electrocardiography (ECG) and transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). After operation, cardiac complications were diagnosed by clinical observation, 12-lead ECG at 1 h, 1 day and 7 days, echocardiography at 1 month and measurement of cardiac enzymes.
RESULTS: After aortic occlusion, a greater decrease in systemic vascular resistance compared with baseline was observed with OR than with EVAR (- 396 and - 70 dyne s/cm5 respectively; P = 0.03). The stroke work index, as a direct measure of myocardial performance, demonstrated a decrease during OR and an increase during EVAR during aortic occlusion (- 6.6 and + 1.7 g m/m2 respectively; P = 0.03) as well as after aortic occlusion (- 7.6 and + 3.4 g m/m2 respectively; P < 0.01), compared with baseline. The incidence of postoperative clinical cardiac complications was comparable in the two study groups; however, myocardial ischaemia, as observed by ECG and TEE, was observed more frequently in the OR group (ten of 19 versus 15 of 57 patients; P = 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Haemodynamic changes were less severe and there was a lower incidence of myocardial ischaemia during EVAR than during OR. Studies are needed to demonstrate whether this may reduce the operative mortality rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11488790     DOI: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01834.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  8 in total

1.  Ruptured AAA: suitability for endovascular repair is associated with lower mortality following open repair.

Authors:  R Barnes; X Kassianides; H Barakat; E Mironska; R Lakshminarayan; I C Chetter
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Successful endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a patient with severe coronary artery disease undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Sun Min Kim; Jae Yeong Cho; Ju Han Kim; Keun-Ho Park; Doo Sun Sim; Young Joon Hong; Youngkeun Ahn; Myung Ho Jeong
Journal:  Chonnam Med J       Date:  2014-04-22

3.  A comparative study of myocardial injury during conventional and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: measurement of cardiac troponin T and plasma cytokine release.

Authors:  M C Barry; J M Hendriks; L C van Dijk; P Pattynama; D Poldermans; D Bouchier Hayes; H van Urk; M R H M van Sambeek
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Endovascular repair or open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a Cochrane systematic review.

Authors:  S A Badger; D W Harkin; P H Blair; P K Ellis; F Kee; R Forster
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Simultaneous endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm and coronary artery bypass grafting in an octogenarian: A case report.

Authors:  Tran Quyet Tien; Ho Tat Bang; Lam Thao Cuong; Nguyen Thai An
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2019-11-27

6.  Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2002-03-01

7.  Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the geriatric population.

Authors:  Athanasios Saratzis; Saif Mohamed
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 8.  Effects of study design and trends for EVAR versus OSR.

Authors:  Robert Hopkins; James Bowen; Kaitryn Campbell; Gord Blackhouse; Guy De Rose; Teresa Novick; Daria O'Reilly; Ron Goeree; Jean-Eric Tarride
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.