Literature DB >> 11488565

Characteristics of bremsstrahlung in electron beams.

T C Zhu1, I J Das, B E Bjärngard.   

Abstract

Clinical electron beams contain an admixture of bremsstrahlung produced in structures in the accelerator head, in field-defining cerrobend or lead cutouts, and in the irradiated patient or water phantom. Accurate knowledge of these components is important for dose calculations and treatment planning. In this study, the bremsstrahlung components are separated for electron beams (energy 6-22 MeV, diameter 0-5 cm) using measurements in water and calculations. The results show that bremsstrahlung from the accelerator head dominates and increases with field size for electron beams generated by accelerators equipped with scattering foils. The bremsstrahlung from the field-defining cerrobend accounts for 10% to 30% of the total bremsstrahlung and decreases with increasing beam radius. The bremsstrahlung is softer than the x-ray beams of corresponding nominal energy since the latter are hardened by the flattening filter. For the 6, 12, and 22 MeV electron beams, the effective attenuation coefficients in water for the bremsstrahlung are 0.058, 0.050, and 0.043 cm(-1). The depths of maximum dose at 100 cm SSD are 0.8, 1.7, and 3.0 cm. The position of the virtual source of the bremsstrahlung shifts downstream from the nominal source position by 20, 13, 5.6 cm, respectively. The lateral bremsstrahlung dose distribution is more forward-peaked for higher electron energy. The bremsstrahlung components could be described for any machine by a set of simple measurements and can be modeled by an analytical expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11488565     DOI: 10.1118/1.1382608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Electron beam characteristics at extended source-to-surface distances for irregular cut-outs.

Authors:  T Arunkumar; Sanjay S Supe; M Ravikumar; S Sathiyan; M Ganesh
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-10

2.  Silicon diodes as an alternative to diamond detectors for depth dose curves and profile measurements of photon and electron radiation.

Authors:  Christian Scherf; Christiane Peter; Jussi Moog; Jörg Licher; Eugen Kara; Klemens Zink; Claus Rödel; Ulla Ramm
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Comparison between small radiation therapy electron beams collimated by Cerrobend and tubular applicators.

Authors:  Cristina Di Venanzio; Marco Marinelli; Alessia Tonnetti; Gianluca Verona-Rinati; Paolo Bagalà; Maria Daniela Falco; Antonio Stefano Guerra; Maria Pimpinella
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Experimental assessment of out-of-field dose components in high energy electron beams used in external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mohamad M Alabdoaburas; Jean-Pierre Mege; Jean Chavaudra; Jérémi Vũ Bezin; Atilla Veres; Florent de Vathaire; Dimitri Lefkopoulos; Ibrahima Diallo
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Tungsten filled 3D printed field shaping devices for electron beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Lawrie Skinner; Benjamin P Fahimian; Amy S Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Nontarget and Out-of-Field Doses from Electron Beam Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Natalia Matuszak; Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska; Agnieszka Skrobala; Adam Ryczkowski; Piotr Romanski; Igor Piotrowski; Katarzyna Kulcenty; Wiktoria Maria Suchorska; Julian Malicki
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08

Review 7.  From cultured to uncultured genome sequences: metagenomics and modeling microbial ecosystems.

Authors:  Daniel R Garza; Bas E Dutilh
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Gamma Putty dosimetric studies in electron beam.

Authors:  Aime M Gloi
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.