Literature DB >> 11487490

Physician-assisted suicide.

L Snyder1, D P Sulmasy.   

Abstract

Medical professional codes have long prohibited physician involvement in assisting a patient's suicide. However, despite ethical and legal prohibitions, calls for the liberalization of this ban have grown in recent years. The medical profession should articulate its views on the arguments for and against changes in public policy and decide whether changes are prudent. In addressing such a contentious issue, physicians, policymakers, and society must fully consider the needs of patients, the vulnerability of particular patient groups, issues of trust and professionalism, and the complexities of end-of-life health care. Physician-assisted suicide is prominent among the issues that define our professional norms and codes of ethics. The American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine (ACP-ASIM) does not support the legalization of physician-assisted suicide. The routine practice of physician-assisted suicide raises serious ethical and other concerns. Legalization would undermine the patient-physician relationship and the trust necessary to sustain it; alter the medical profession's role in society; and endanger the value our society places on life, especially on the lives of disabled, incompetent, and vulnerable individuals. The ACP-ASIM remains thoroughly committed to improving care for patients at the end of life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American College of Physicians; American Society of Internal Medicine; Death and Euthanasia; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11487490     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-3-200108070-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  8 in total

1.  Approach to end of life care.

Authors:  David H Lee
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2002

2.  Responding to Patient Requests for Hastened Death: Physician Aid in Dying and the Clinical Oncologist.

Authors:  Rebecca A Spence; Charles D Blanke; Thomas J Keating; Lynne P Taylor
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  The impact on patient trust of legalising physician aid in dying.

Authors:  M Hall; F Trachtenberg; E Dugan
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Abandonment at the end of life from patient, caregiver, nurse, and physician perspectives: loss of continuity and lack of closure.

Authors:  Anthony L Back; Jessica P Young; Ellen McCown; Ruth A Engelberg; Elizabeth K Vig; Lynn F Reinke; Marjorie D Wenrich; Barbara B McGrath; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-03-09

5.  Islamic perspectives on clinical intervention near the end-of-life: We can but must we?

Authors:  Aasim I Padela; Omar Qureshi
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2017-12

6.  Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in "vulnerable" groups.

Authors:  Margaret P Battin; Agnes van der Heide; Linda Ganzini; Gerrit van der Wal; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Attitudes toward Euthanasia and Related Issues among Physicians and Patients in a Multi-cultural Society of Malaysia.

Authors:  Mohammad Yousuf Rathor; Mohammad Fauzi Abdul Rani; Mohammad Arif Shahar; A Rehman Jamalludin; Shahrin Tarmizi Bin Che Abdullah; Ahmad Marzuki Bin Omar; Azarisman Shah Bin Mohamad Shah
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2014-07

8.  Definition of Terms Used in Limitation of Treatment and Providing Palliative Care at the End of Life: The Indian Council of Medical Research Commission Report.

Authors:  Naveen Salins; Roop Gursahani; Roli Mathur; Shivakumar Iyer; Stanley Macaden; Nagesh Simha; Raj Kumar Mani; M R Rajagopal
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.