Literature DB >> 11487234

Toxicity evaluation of prophylactic treatments for mites and pinworms in mice.

L A Toth1, C Oberbeck, C M Straign, S Frazier, J E Rehg.   

Abstract

The detection of external and internal parasites in laboratory mice is a particularly problematic aspect of animal health evaluation. Because these organisms must be detected by direct examination of the feces or hair coat, low-level infestation or sporadic shedding can make them difficult to detect, thereby undermining confidence that negative reports are truly negative. Prophylactic treatment of suspect colonies with anthelminthics and/or insecticides may therefore be indicated under some circumstances. However, when considering the use of prophylactic treatments, the potential for toxicity is an important factor, especially in genetically modified strains of mice. To evaluate the potential toxicity of prophylactic anti- parasitic treatments on strains of mice that are commonly used as experimental models and in genetic engineering in our facility, we surveyed a number of strains and ages of mice for toxic reactions during treatment regimens that combine anthelminthic and anti-acaricidal agents. Three experimental protocols (ivermectin, piperazine, and dichlorvos in combination; ivermectin alone; and fenbendazole/permethrin or fenbendazole/dichlorvos) were evaluated. Our data suggest a potential for toxicity associated with these treatments and indicate to us that prophylactic treatment regimens should be initiated with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11487234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1060-0558


  9 in total

1.  Assessment of immune activation in mice before and after eradication of mite infestation.

Authors:  Nancy A Johnston; Rita A Trammell; Susan Ball-Kell; Steven Verhulst; Linda A Toth
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Treatment and eradication of murine fur mites: I. Toxicologic evaluation of ivermectin-compounded feed.

Authors:  Rodolfo J Ricart Arbona; Neil S Lipman; Elyn R Riedel; Felix R Wolf
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Treatment and eradication of murine fur mites: III. Treatment of a large mouse colony with ivermectin-compounded feed.

Authors:  Rodolfo J Ricart Arbona; Neil S Lipman; Felix R Wolf
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Use of selamectin and moxidectin in the treatment of mouse fur mites.

Authors:  Deborah M Mook; Kimberly A Benjamin
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  Food intake in laboratory rats provided standard and fenbendazole-supplemented diets.

Authors:  Peter J Vento; Megan E Swartz; Lisa Be Martin; Derek Daniels
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  Effects of fenbendazole on routine immune response parameters of BALB/c mice.

Authors:  Carolyn Cray; David Villar; Julia Zaias; Norman H Altman
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.232

7.  Unexpected antitumorigenic effect of fenbendazole when combined with supplementary vitamins.

Authors:  Ping Gao; Chi V Dang; Julie Watson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  Guidance Regarding Sample Collection and Refinement of Fecal Flotation Exam for the Isolation of Aspiculuris tetraptera.

Authors:  Anna E Goodroe; Victoria K Baxter; Julie Watson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  Ivermectin-compounded Feed Compared with Topical Moxidectin-Imidacloprid for Eradication of Demodex musculi in Laboratory Mice.

Authors:  Melissa A Nashat; Rodolfo J Ricart Arbona; Michelle L Lepherd; Sara F Santagostino; Robert S Livingston; Elyn R Riedel; Neil S Lipman
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 1.232

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.