Literature DB >> 11487158

Evaluation of fiber-composite laminate in the restoration of immature, nonvital maxillary central incisors.

J R Pene1, J I Nicholls, G W Harrington.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of fiber-composite laminate, a reinforcement ribbon embedded throughout a composite restoration, to reinforce immature maxillary central incisors. Twenty-six mature maxillary central incisors were prepared a minimum of 3 mm below the facial cementoenamel junction to simulate immature nonvital teeth. They were separated into 3 groups: group 1 was unfilled and served as a control; group 2 was filled to the depth of the preparation with composite; and group 3 was filled with composite and Connect Reinforcement Ribbon. The specimens were subjected to class I loading in an Instron Testing Machine until catastrophic failure occurred. The results indicate a highly significant difference between the groups (p < or = 0.003). Group 1 fractured at an average load of 31.08 kg, group 2 at 51.00 kg, and group 3 at 37.93 kg. These findings suggest that composite alone increases fracture resistance of the immature tooth model more than composite with Reinforcement Ribbon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11487158     DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200101000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  8 in total

1.  Flexural strength of composites: influences of polyethylene fiber reinforcement and type of composite.

Authors:  C L Pereira; F F Demarco; M S Cenci; P W R Osinaga; E M Piovesan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth and its effect on single visit apexification versus complete obturation using MTA and biodentine.

Authors:  Pawan Darak; Manoj Likhitkar; Shachi Goenka; Abhinav Kumar; Priyanka Madale; Ashwini Kelode
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-04-30

3.  Adhesive restoration of anterior endodontically treated teeth: influence of post length on fracture strength.

Authors:  Anaïs Ramírez-Sebastià; Tissiana Bortolotto; Maria Cattani-Lorente; Lluis Giner; Miguel Roig; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparing the reinforcing effects of a resin modified glassionomer cement, Flowable compomer, and Flowable composite in the restoration of calcium hydroxide-treated immature roots in vitro.

Authors:  Rani S Prathibha
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2011-01

5.  Fracture resistance of structurally compromised and normal endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Vajihesadat Mortazavi; Mohammadhossein Fathi; Najmeh Katiraei; Shirin Shahnaseri; Hamid Badrian; Navid Khalighinejad
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-03

6.  An Immature Traumatic Teeth Management With Apical Pathology Using the Novel Biodentine™ Obturation: A Case Report.

Authors:  Srividhya Srinivasan; Ramya Vengidesh; Anupama Ramachandran; Sadasiva Kadandale
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-29

7.  Reinforcing an immature tooth model using three different restorative materials.

Authors:  Pooja Misar; Hemalatha Hiremath; Chhaya Harinkhere; Shailendra S Sonawane; Vinay Sharma; Kuldeep Singh Rana
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2022-03-21

8.  Fracture resistance of immature teeth filled with mineral trioxide aggregate or calcium-enriched mixture cement: An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Amin Salem Milani; Saeed Rahimi; Zahra Borna; Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi; Mahmoud Bahari; Alireza Sighari Deljavan
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.