PURPOSE: Because new therapeutic approaches target tumors expressing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the aim was to undertake a thorough analysis of the expression profile of EGFR in breast cancer and to reassess its prognostic value. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tumor EGFR levels were determined by a specific ligand binding assay in 780 consecutive breast cancer patients followed in our institute between 1980 and 1993. Mean age was 61 years (25-85 years). All patients had undergone tumor resection with axillary lymph node dissection: 373 patients (47.8%) underwent mastectomy, 37 (5%) subcutaneous mastectomy and 370 (47.2%) tumorectomy. RESULTS: EGFR levels ranged between non-detectable up to 789 fmol/mg protein. EGFR median value was 9 fmol/mg protein and only a small proportion of patients exhibited a relatively marked EGFR expression. There was no link between tumor size, grade, node status and EGFR tumoral levels. There was a constant and significant decrease in EGFR tumoral levels according to patient age. A significant inverse relationship was found between estradiol receptors (ER) and EGFR. Median follow-up was 97 months with a minimum at 4 months and a maximum at 228 months. From univariate analysis it was found that histological grade, tumor size, node status and ER status were all significant predictors of survival, considering metastasis-free as well as overall survival. Using multivariable analysis, only histological grade, tumor size and node status remained independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSION: EGFR determination is of limited value as a prognostic indicator in breast cancer.
PURPOSE: Because new therapeutic approaches target tumors expressing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the aim was to undertake a thorough analysis of the expression profile of EGFR in breast cancer and to reassess its prognostic value. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TumorEGFR levels were determined by a specific ligand binding assay in 780 consecutive breast cancerpatients followed in our institute between 1980 and 1993. Mean age was 61 years (25-85 years). All patients had undergone tumor resection with axillary lymph node dissection: 373 patients (47.8%) underwent mastectomy, 37 (5%) subcutaneous mastectomy and 370 (47.2%) tumorectomy. RESULTS:EGFR levels ranged between non-detectable up to 789 fmol/mg protein. EGFR median value was 9 fmol/mg protein and only a small proportion of patients exhibited a relatively marked EGFR expression. There was no link between tumor size, grade, node status and EGFRtumoral levels. There was a constant and significant decrease in EGFRtumoral levels according to patient age. A significant inverse relationship was found between estradiol receptors (ER) and EGFR. Median follow-up was 97 months with a minimum at 4 months and a maximum at 228 months. From univariate analysis it was found that histological grade, tumor size, node status and ER status were all significant predictors of survival, considering metastasis-free as well as overall survival. Using multivariable analysis, only histological grade, tumor size and node status remained independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSION:EGFR determination is of limited value as a prognostic indicator in breast cancer.
Authors: John Foley; Nicole K Nickerson; Seungyoon Nam; Kah Tan Allen; Jennifer L Gilmore; Kenneth P Nephew; David J Riese Journal: Semin Cell Dev Biol Date: 2010-09-09 Impact factor: 7.727
Authors: Mothaffar F Rimawi; Priya B Shetty; Heidi L Weiss; Rachel Schiff; C Kent Osborne; Gary C Chamness; Richard M Elledge Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jennifer L Gilmore; Jeffrey A Scott; Zhor Bouizar; Alex Robling; Sarah E Pitfield; David J Riese; John Foley Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2007-09-20 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: A K Koutras; K T Kalogeras; M-A Dimopoulos; R M Wirtz; U Dafni; E Briasoulis; D Pectasides; H Gogas; C Christodoulou; G Aravantinos; G Zografos; E Timotheadou; P Papakostas; H Linardou; E Razis; T Economopoulos; H P Kalofonos; G Fountzilas Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2008-11-04 Impact factor: 7.640