Literature DB >> 11484740

Leak-point pressure: clinical application of values at two different volumes.

M T McLennan1, C F Melick, A E Bent.   

Abstract

A prospective analysis of 306 consecutive patients with genuine stress incontinence was performed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of additional leak-point pressure (LPP) determination at 200 ml. LPP values at both volumes were compared to maximal urethral closure pressure (MUCP) in an attempt to determine a critical cut-off value for the detection of a low MUCP (< or =20 cmH2O). A positive LPP at 150 ml was found in 157 patients. The mean LPP for patients with a low MUCP was 58.5 cmH2O compared to 71.6 for those with a normal MUCP, which was statistically significant (p = 0.01). The correlation coefficient between LPP and MUCP was 0.317. A negative LPP was found in 30% (24/79) of the total having a low MUCP. The addition of values for LPP at 200 ml resulted in an increase in the number who leaked to 191, a 50% increase in the detection rate of low MUCP and a statistically significant relationship between LPP < or =60 cmH2O and low MUCP. Various critical cut-off values for LPP demonstrated good specificity but poor sensitivity for the detection of a low MUCP. It was concluded that there was a statistically significant relationship between LPP and MUCP. Performing LPP at 200 ml provides additional clinically useful diagnostic information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11484740     DOI: 10.1007/s001920070040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  6 in total

1.  Fluid perfused urethral pressure profilometry and Valsalva leak point pressure: a comparative study in a biophysical model of the urethra.

Authors:  Tim Idzenga; Johan J M Pel; Ron van Mastrigt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Urethral pressure reflectometry in women with pelvic organ prolapse: a study of reproducibility.

Authors:  Yasmine Khayyami; Gunnar Lose; Niels Klarskov
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Leak point pressure at different bladder volumes in stress urinary incontinence in women: Comparison between Valsalva and cough-induced leak point pressure.

Authors:  Young Ho Seo; Sun-Ouck Kim; Ho Song Yu; Dongdeuk Kwon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Urodynamics, the supine empty bladder stress test, and incontinence severity.

Authors:  Charles W Nager; Stephen R Kraus; Kim Kenton; Larry Sirls; Toby C Chai; Clifford Wai; Gary Sutkin; Wendy Leng; Heather Litman; Liyuan Huang; Sharon Tennstedt; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Correlation of maximum urethral closure pressure with Valsalva leak point pressure using air-charged urodynamic catheters.

Authors:  Terry White; Amie Kawasaki; Reneita V Ross; Rony A Adam; Thinh H Duong
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-05-15

Review 6.  [Urodynamic studies prior to urinary incontinence surgery : What is useful?]

Authors:  A Kaufmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.