Literature DB >> 11484442

[Color duplex ultrasound imaging of renal arteries and detection of hemodynamically relevant renal artery stenoses].

T Zeller1, U Frank, M Späth, H Roskamm.   

Abstract

AIM: Although colour coded Doppler ultrasound (CCDU) is established as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for detecting renal artery stenoses (RAS), no uniform criterion for defining a hemodynamically relevant stenosis (i.e. angiographic stenosis of > or = 70% of the diameter) exists. We therefore investigated the predictive value of the renal-aortic flow-velocity ratio (RAR) > 3.5 m/s and a difference of < 0.05 between the left and right side for the resistance index according to Pourcelot (dRI) in the detection of a relevant RAS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed 500 consecutive CCDU examinations of patients with hypertension retrospectively. An RAR > 3.5 and/or a lateral inequality of the RI < 0.05 were used as stenosis criterion.
RESULTS: In 448 patients (90%) both renal arteries could be found, in 11 patients (2%) only the right artery, in 6 patients (1%) the left artery, and in 35 patients (7%) no renal artery was detectable. In 98 patients (19.6%), RAS was diagnosed, 69 (71%) of them underwent angiography. 38 patients presented an RAR > 3.5 plus dRI > 0.05. In 29 of these, angiography was performed. 96% of them presented with an RAS of > or = 70% and 4% showed an RAS of 40-69% (specificity 97%, sensitivity 76%). In 54 patients the RAR was > 3.5, but dRI < 0.05. 24% of the patients undergoing angiography (n = 37) presented with an RAS of > or = 70%, 68% with an RAS of 40-69%, and 8% with an RAS of < 40% (specificity 60%, sensitivity 100%). 44 hypertensive patients who underwent angiography after a CCDU examination not suggesting the presence of RAS were used as control group.
CONCLUSION: An experienced physician using a high quality colour-coded duplex-machine can reliably detect the renal arteries. The presence of RAS can be diagnosed with certainty by CCDU applying the criterion of RAR > 3.5, but the diagnosis of a one-sided haemodynamically relevant RAS can only be certain if the criterion of dRI > 0.05 is used in addition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11484442     DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-15287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultraschall Med        ISSN: 0172-4614            Impact factor:   6.548


  8 in total

1.  [Ultrasound diagnostics of renal blood vessels and transplant kidney].

Authors:  K F Stock
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Unrecognized secondary causes of hypertension in patients with hypertensive urgency/emergency: prevalence and co-prevalence.

Authors:  Jan Börgel; Stephanie Springer; Jasmin Ghafoor; Daniel Arndt; Hans-Werner Duchna; Andreas Barthel; Sibylle Werner; Josef Van Helden; Christoph Hanefeld; Horst Neubauer; Daniel Bulut; Andreas Mügge
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  [Renal sonography].

Authors:  K Wolters; S Herget-Rosenthal; M Langenbeck
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 4.  [Vascular and parenchymal diseases of the kidney].

Authors:  H J Michaely; M Reichert; S Weckbach; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  Revascularization as a treatment to improve renal function.

Authors:  Helen V Alderson; James P Ritchie; Philip A Kalra
Journal:  Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis       Date:  2014-02-20

6.  A randomized, multi-center, prospective study comparing best medical treatment versus best medical treatment plus renal artery stenting in patients with hemodynamically relevant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RADAR) - one-year results of a pre-maturely terminated study.

Authors:  Thomas Zeller; Hans Krankenberg; Andrejs Erglis; Erwin Blessing; Torsten Fuss; Dierk Scheinert; Ralf Weser; Beatrix B Doerr; Wilfrid D Yollo; Joerg Radermacher
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  RADAR - A randomised, multi-centre, prospective study comparing best medical treatment versus best medical treatment plus renal artery stenting in patients with haemodynamically relevant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Uwe Schwarzwälder; Michael Hauk; Thomas Zeller
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Ultrasound diagnostics of renal artery stenosis: Stenosis criteria, CEUS and recurrent in-stent stenosis.

Authors:  W Schäberle; L Leyerer; W Schierling; K Pfister
Journal:  Gefasschirurgie       Date:  2015-08-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.