OBJECTIVE: Started in late 1994, the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program is a major entitlement program that provides states with free vaccines for disadvantaged children. Some evaluation studies have been conducted, but they do not include individually matched pre-post comparisons of physician responses. This project studied the effect of the VFC on the physician likelihood of referring children to public vaccine clinics for immunizations. DESIGN: In 1999, trained personnel conducted a survey of a cohort of physicians who previously participated in surveys on barriers to childhood vaccination conducted before VFC implementation. Responses were matched, and pre- versus post-VFC comparisons were made. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Minnesota and Pennsylvania primary care physicians selected by stratified random sampling and initially studied in 1990 to 1991 and 1993, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Likelihood of referral of a child to a public vaccine clinic. RESULTS: On a scale of 0 to 10, physician likelihood of referring an uninsured child decreased by a mean of 1.9 (95% confidence interval: 1.2-2.5) from pre- to post-VFC. Two fifths (45%) of physicians reported that the VFC decreased the number of referrals from their practice to public vaccine clinics and 50% gave intermediate responses. Among physicians who participate in VFC, only 9% were likely to refer a Medicaid-insured child in contrast to 44% of those not participating. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians' reported referral and likelihood of referring Medicaid-insured and uninsured children has decreased because of VFC in Minnesota and Pennsylvania.vaccination/economics, vaccination/legislation and jurisprudence, immunization programs/economics, immunization programs/utilization, vaccines/economics, Medicaid/economics, national health programs United States, child health services.
OBJECTIVE: Started in late 1994, the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program is a major entitlement program that provides states with free vaccines for disadvantaged children. Some evaluation studies have been conducted, but they do not include individually matched pre-post comparisons of physician responses. This project studied the effect of the VFC on the physician likelihood of referring children to public vaccine clinics for immunizations. DESIGN: In 1999, trained personnel conducted a survey of a cohort of physicians who previously participated in surveys on barriers to childhood vaccination conducted before VFC implementation. Responses were matched, and pre- versus post-VFC comparisons were made. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Minnesota and Pennsylvania primary care physicians selected by stratified random sampling and initially studied in 1990 to 1991 and 1993, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Likelihood of referral of a child to a public vaccine clinic. RESULTS: On a scale of 0 to 10, physician likelihood of referring an uninsured child decreased by a mean of 1.9 (95% confidence interval: 1.2-2.5) from pre- to post-VFC. Two fifths (45%) of physicians reported that the VFC decreased the number of referrals from their practice to public vaccine clinics and 50% gave intermediate responses. Among physicians who participate in VFC, only 9% were likely to refer a Medicaid-insured child in contrast to 44% of those not participating. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians' reported referral and likelihood of referring Medicaid-insured and uninsured children has decreased because of VFC in Minnesota and Pennsylvania.vaccination/economics, vaccination/legislation and jurisprudence, immunization programs/economics, immunization programs/utilization, vaccines/economics, Medicaid/economics, national health programs United States, child health services.
Authors: Stephanie A S Staras; Susan T Vadaparampil; Laura T Haderxhanaj; Elizabeth A Shenkman Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Lyle J Fagnan; Scott A Shipman; James A Gaudino; Jo Mahler; Andrew L Sussman; Jennifer Holub Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Doug Campos-Outcalt; Michelle Jeffcott-Pera; Pamela Carter-Smith; Bellinda K Schoof; Herbert F Young Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Tammy A Santibanez; Richard Kent Zimmerman; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Ilene Katz Jewell; Inis J Bardella Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Teri L Malo; Donna Hassani; Stephanie A S Staras; Elizabeth A Shenkman; Anna R Giuliano; Susan T Vadaparampil Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2013-05
Authors: Richard K Zimmerman; Melissa Tabbarah; Janine E Janosky; Barbara Bardenheier; Judith A Troy; Ilene K Jewell; Barbara P Yawn Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2006-01-12 Impact factor: 3.295