Literature DB >> 114833

Evaluation of medical practices. The case for technology assessment.

H V Fineberg, H H Hiatt.   

Abstract

We believe that the systematic evaluation of medical practices, especially those that are risky or costly deserves more attention. Available methods are limited, and definitive assessments of innovative or controversial practices are infrequent. Nevertheless, some evaluations have successfully enhanced the use of effective practices and diminished the reliance on ineffective ones. Greater efforts at evaluation can improve the quality of patient care, avoid waste and promote the more rational use of health resources. The cost of assessing new practices should be viewed as an intrinsic part of the cost of medical care. Physicians and medical societies bear primary responsibility for recognizing the need for this evaluation, for enlisting other experts, participating in technology assessment and working to translate the results of evaluation into practice. The commitment of government agencies, insurance companies and teaching institutions is also essential to an effective program of evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 114833     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197911153012004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  13 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review.

Authors:  M J Van Der Meijden; H J Tange; J Troost; A Hasman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-01-28       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Can the use of radiography of arms and legs in accident and emergency units be made more efficient?

Authors:  M C Charny; W P Ennis; C J Roberts; K T Evans
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-01-31

3.  Government health policy and the diffusion of new medical devices.

Authors:  B J Hillman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Toward justice in health care.

Authors:  R Bayer; D Callahan; A L Caplan; B Jennings
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Monitoring the diffusion of a technology: coronary artery bypass surgery in Ontario.

Authors:  G M Anderson; J Lomas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Clinical chemistry laboratory productivity: a comparison between a Canadian and a British teaching hospital.

Authors:  A R Henderson; M D Gardner
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Early identification of alcohol abuse: 1. Critical issues and psychosocial indicators for a composite index.

Authors:  H A Skinner; S Holt; Y Israel
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1981-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Medical technology: assessment, adoption, and utilization.

Authors:  A L Greer
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Controversies about the treatment of myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  L P Rowland
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Incremental prognostic value of stress echocardiography as an adjunct to exercise electrocardiography after uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Bigi; A Desideri; A Galati; J J Bax; C Coletta; C Fiorentini; P M Fioretti
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.