Literature DB >> 11482720

Methodological considerations in the determination of working length.

M A Martínez-Lozano1, L Forner-Navarro, J L Sánchez-Cortés, C Llena-Puy.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of an electronic system for the determination of working length, in comparison with two radiological methods (conventional film and digital radiography).
METHODOLOGY: The study sample consisted of 28 root canals belonging to 20 human mandibular teeth. A comparison was made between the working length measurements obtained by two radiological methods (conventional film and digital radiography) and an apex locator, using as gold standard the observation of the file position within the root following selective grinding of the root tissue.
RESULTS: The electronic method was satisfactory in 67.8% of cases, versus 50.6% and 61.4% for the conventional and digital radiological methods. respectively. No statistically significant differences occurred between the techniques according to the chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric tests.
CONCLUSIONS: None of the techniques was totally satisfactory in establishing the true working length. There were no differences between the techniques investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11482720     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00400.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  13 in total

1.  Accuracy of two different apex locators in primary teeth with and without root resorption.

Authors:  Haluk Bodur; Mesut Odabaş; Ozlem Tulunoğlu; Ali Cemal Tinaz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Formulating a regression equation for determination of working length in primary molars using apex locators: a clinical study.

Authors:  A Dandempally; R Muppa; M K Duddu; P Bhupatiraju; S Nallanchakrava
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2013-06-18

3.  In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators.

Authors:  Viresh Chopra; Shibani Grover; S Datta Prasad
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2008-04

4.  Imaging techniques in endodontics: an overview.

Authors:  B S Deepak; T S Subash; V J Narmatha; T Anamika; T K Snehil; D B Nandini
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2012-03-22

5.  A comparative evaluation of working length with digital radiography and third generation apex locator (ProPex) in the presence of various intracanal irrigants: An in vivo/ex vivo study.

Authors:  Irfana Khursheed; Ruchika Bansal; Tajinder Bansal; Harkanwal Preet Singh; Madhulika Yadav; K Jetender Reddy
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-01

6.  Evaluation of Dentaport ZX and Raypex 6 electronic apex locators: an in vivo study.

Authors:  S Moscoso; K Pineda; J Basilio; C Alvarado; M Roig; F Duran-Sindreu
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2014-03-01

7.  In vivo evaluation of the accuracy of working length determination using an electronic apex locater IPEX (NSK) on vital uninfected teeth and teeth with radiographic evidence of periapical lesions.

Authors:  Kachenahalli Narasimhaiah Raghu; Jacob G Daniel; Shuaib Razvi; Ramachandra Vinaychandra; Annapurna Kini; Kunigal Jayram Nandakishore
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2014-12

8.  Comparison between two methods of working length determination and its effect on radiographic extent of root canal filling: a clinical study [ISRCTN71486641].

Authors:  L Smadi
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2006-02-11       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Working Length Determination of Root Canal of Young Permanent Tooth: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  A Diwanji; As Rathore; R Arora; V Dhar; A Madhusudan; J Doshi
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2014-07

10.  Comparative evaluation of three methods to measure working length - Manual tactile sensation, digital radiograph, and multidetector computed tomography: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Kaushik Dutta; Priti D Desai; Utapal Kumar Das; Soumayabrata Sarkar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.