Literature DB >> 11482417

"In really great danger..." The concept of risk in general practice.

S Reventlow1, A C Hvas, C Tulinius.   

Abstract

The language of risk has many meanings, and in this article we demonstrate a discrepancy between individually perceived risk and the medical understanding of risk as understood and communicated by general practitioners (GPs). Risk is experienced and interpreted by people in a cultural context, i.e. the same objective risk can be perceived in many different ways and given a different meaning in daily life. GPs' evaluation of risk is made on the basis of our epidemiological knowledge, the medical culture of risk perception and the GP's personal experience and interpretation. The theoretical focus in the article is a synthesis of two theories: patient-centred general practice and theory based in anthropology about risk as culturally and socially constructed. We use empirical data from a qualitative study to illuminate the discussion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11482417     DOI: 10.1080/028134301750235268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  12 in total

1.  [Genetics and quaternary prevention. The example of haemochromatosis].

Authors:  J Gérvas; M Pérez Fernández
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 2.  Categorization and association analysis of risk factors for adverse drug events.

Authors:  Lina Zhou; Anamika Paul Rupa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  The RISAP-study: a complex intervention in risk communication and shared decision-making in general practice.

Authors:  Pia Kirkegaard; Adrian G K Edwards; Bo Hansen; Mette D Hansen; Morten S A Jensen; Torsten Lauritzen; Mette B Risoer; Janus L Thomsen
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Presenting the improved possibility for staying well might be better than talking about change in risk: use of the non-occurrence probability increase (NOPI).

Authors:  Bertil Hagström; Ronny K Gunnarsson; Mark Rosenfeld
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  Effect of interventions including provision of personalised cancer risk information on accuracy of risk perception and psychological responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Max Bayne; Madi Fairey; Barbora Silarova; Simon J Griffin; Stephen J Sharp; William M P Klein; Stephen Sutton; Juliet A Usher-Smith
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2019-08-11

6.  The impact of information about different absolute benefits and harms on intention to participate in colorectal cancer screening: A think-aloud study and online randomised experiment.

Authors:  Juliet A Usher-Smith; Katie M Mills; Christiane Riedinger; Catherine L Saunders; Lise M Helsingen; Lyubov Lytvyn; Maaike Buskermolen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Michael Bretthauer; Gordon Guyatt; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Behavioural Challenges Associated With Risk-Adapted Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Juliet Usher-Smith; Christian von Wagner; Alex Ghanouni
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

8.  The representation of risk in routine medical experience: what actions for contemporary health policy?

Authors:  Silvia Riva; Marco Monti; Paola Iannello; Alessandro Antonietti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The role of diseases, risk factors and symptoms in the definition of multimorbidity - a systematic review.

Authors:  Tora Grauers Willadsen; Anna Bebe; Rasmus Køster-Rasmussen; Dorte Ejg Jarbøl; Ann Dorrit Guassora; Frans Boch Waldorff; Susanne Reventlow; Niels de Fine Olivarius
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.581

10.  Incorporating cancer risk information into general practice: a qualitative study using focus groups with health professionals.

Authors:  Juliet A Usher-Smith; Barbora Silarova; Alison Ward; Jane Youell; Kenneth R Muir; Jackie Campbell; Joanne Warcaba
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.