Literature DB >> 11481655

Biomarkers as biological indicators of xenobiotic exposure.

F Gil1, A Pla.   

Abstract

The presence of a xenobiotic in the environment always represents a risk for living organisms. However, to talk about impregnation there is a need to detect toxicity in the organism, and the concept of intoxication is related to specific organ alterations and clinical symptoms. Moreover, the relationship between the toxic levels within the organism and the toxic response is rather complex and has a difficult forecast because it depends on several factors, namely toxicokinetic and genetic factors. One of the methods to quantify the interaction with xenobiotics and its potential impact on living organisms, including the human being, is monitoring by the use of the so-called biomarkers. They can provide measures of the exposure, toxic effect and individual susceptibility to environmental chemical compounds and may be very useful to assess and control the risk of long-term outcomes associated with exposure to xenobiotic (i.e. heavy metals, halogenated hydrocarbons, pesticides). Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11481655     DOI: 10.1002/jat.769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0260-437X            Impact factor:   3.446


  19 in total

1.  Comparing metabolite profiles of habitual diet in serum and urine.

Authors:  Mary C Playdon; Joshua N Sampson; Amanda J Cross; Rashmi Sinha; Kristin A Guertin; Kristin A Moy; Nathaniel Rothman; Melinda L Irwin; Susan T Mayne; Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon; Steven C Moore
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Biomonitoring of cadmium, chromium, nickel and arsenic in general population living near mining and active industrial areas in Southern Tunisia.

Authors:  Rim Khlifi; Pablo Olmedo; Fernando Gil; Molka Feki-Tounsi; Bouthaina Hammami; Ahmed Rebai; Amel Hamza-Chaffai
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Peptide biomarkers as evidence of perchlorate biodegradation.

Authors:  Reema Bansal; Ronald L Crawford; Andrzej J Paszczynski
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Biomarkers of mercury toxicity: Past, present, and future trends.

Authors:  Vasco Branco; Sam Caito; Marcelo Farina; João Teixeira da Rocha; Michael Aschner; Cristina Carvalho
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 6.393

5.  Cadmium in blood of Tunisian men and risk of bladder cancer: interactions with arsenic exposure and smoking.

Authors:  Molka Feki-Tounsi; Pablo Olmedo; Fernando Gil; Rim Khlifi; Mohamed-Nabil Mhiri; Ahmed Rebai; Amel Hamza-Chaffai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Glutathione and its dependent enzymes' modulatory responses to toxic metals and metalloids in fish--a review.

Authors:  K Srikanth; E Pereira; A C Duarte; I Ahmad
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Factors and Trends Affecting the Identification of a Reliable Biomarker for Diesel Exhaust Exposure.

Authors:  David A Morgott
Journal:  Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 12.561

8.  Urinary delta-ALA: a potential biomarker of exposure and neurotoxic effect in rats co-treated with a mixture of lead, arsenic and manganese.

Authors:  Vanda Andrade; M Luísa Mateus; M Camila Batoréu; Michael Aschner; A P Marreilha dos Santos
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 9.  Nanotechnology-based electrochemical sensors for biomonitoring chemical exposures.

Authors:  Richard C Barry; Yuehe Lin; Jun Wang; Guodong Liu; Charles A Timchalk
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 5.563

10.  Experimental manipulation of dietary lead levels in great tit nestlings: limited effects on growth, physiology and survival.

Authors:  Tapio Eeva; Miia Rainio; Åsa Berglund; Mirella Kanerva; Janina Stauffer; Mareike Stöwe; Suvi Ruuskanen
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.