Literature DB >> 1148161

Acetylcholine receptors in normal and denervated rat diaphragm muscle. II. Comparison of junctional and extrajunctional receptors.

J P Brockes, Z W Hall.   

Abstract

Acetylcholine (ACh) receptors have been purified separately from normal rat diaphragm muscle (junctional receptors) and from extrajunctional regions of denervated diaphragm (extrajunctional receptors) in order to compare their properties. The toxin-receptor complexes of the two receptors were indistinguishable by gel filtration and by zone sedimentation in sucrose gradients, and showed identical precipitation curves with rabbit antiserum to the eel ACh receptor. Both toxin-receptor complexes bind concanavalin A and are therefore probably glycoproteins. Low concentrations of d-tubocuratine (dTC) were more effective in decreasing the rate of toxin binding to junctional than to extrajunctional receptors. The apparent dissociation constant for dTC binding to the junctional receptor was 4.5 X 10 minus 8 M, whereas the value for the extrajunctional receptor was 5.5 X 10 minus 7 M. When the complexes were analyzed by isoelectric focusing, the junctional complex focused at approximately 0.15 pH unit lower than the extrajunctional complex. This result was also found with crude preparations of receptor. We conclude that junctional and extrajunctional receptors are similar but distinct molecules. The properties of receptors present in neonatal diaphragm muscle were also examined and found to be similar to those of receptors in denervated muscle, as shown by dTC inhibition and isoelectric focusing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1148161     DOI: 10.1021/bi00681a009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  23 in total

Review 1.  Immunopathologic events at the endplate in myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  T Ashizawa; S H Appel
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  1985

2.  Appearance of new acetylcholine receptors on the baby chick biventer cervicis and denervated rat diaphragm muscles after blockade with alpha-bungarotoxin.

Authors:  C Chiung Chang; M Jai Su; L Hsien Tung
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Electrophoresis and diffusion in the plane of the cell membrane.

Authors:  M Poo; J W Lam; N Orida; A W Chao
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Channel open time and metabolic stability of synaptic and extrasynaptic acetylcholine receptors on cultured chick myotubes.

Authors:  S M Schuetze; E F Frank; G D Fischbach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Regulation of acetylcholine receptor levels by a cholinergic agonist in mouse muscle cell cultures.

Authors:  M D Noble; T H Brown; J H Peacock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Biochemical investigations of ionic channels in excitable membranes.

Authors:  F Hucho; W Schiebler
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1977-12-29       Impact factor: 3.396

7.  Use of a replica technique to isolate muscle cell lines defective in expressing the acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  R A Black; Z W Hall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Interaction of di-iodinated 125I-labelled alpha-bungarotoxin and reversible cholinergic ligands with intact synaptic acetylcholine receptors on isolated skeletal-muscle fibres from the rat.

Authors:  P Darveniza; J A Morgan-Hughes; E J Thompson
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1979-09-01       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Degradation of junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors by developing rat skeletal muscle.

Authors:  J H Steinbach; J Merlie; S Heinemann; R Bloch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Activation and desensitization of embryonic-like receptor channels in mouse muscle by acetylcholine concentration steps.

Authors:  C Franke; D Költgen; H Hatt; J Dudel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.