Literature DB >> 1148135

Performance rating scale for peer and self assessment.

B S Linn, M Arostegui, R Zeppa.   

Abstract

A performance rating scale was developed and tested on a class of junior medical students who rated themselves and four to ten of their peers. When 928 ratings were factor analysed, two strong factors, knowledge and relationship, emerged. Test-retest reliabilities were good. Validity was measured by correlation of ratings with grades, and though both sources of ratings correlated significantly with grades given by faculty, peer ratings were more highly related to grades than were self ratings. Students tended to rate themselves lower than they were rated by their peers. Grades are probably not the best estimate of performance, but are currently one of the most reliable. Use of the scale to judge performance of physicians in practice has not been tested. The question of how such evaluation of peer and self would relate to other measures of quality of care is raised.

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1148135     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1975.tb01902.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Med Educ        ISSN: 0007-1110


  10 in total

1.  A survey of resident opinions on peer evaluation in a large internal medicine residency program.

Authors:  Denise M Dupras; Randall S Edson
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-06

2.  Medical students' views on peer assessment of professionalism.

Authors:  Louise Arnold; Carolyn K Shue; Barbara Kritt; Shiphra Ginsburg; David T Stern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Student peer assessment in evidence-based medicine (EBM) searching skills training: an experiment.

Authors:  Jonathan D Eldredge; David G Bear; Sharon J Wayne; Paul P Perea
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2013-10

4.  Accuracy and reliability of peer assessment of athletic training psychomotor laboratory skills.

Authors:  Melissa C Marty; Jolene M Henning; John T Willse
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Factors That Determine the Perceived Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Collaborative Learning: a Mixed Methods Design.

Authors:  Dayane Daou; Ramzi Sabra; Nathalie K Zgheib
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-05-19

6.  Dental examinations for quality control: peer review versus self-assessment.

Authors:  P Milgrom; P Weinstein; P Ratener; W A Read; K Morrison
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  A New Qualitative Typology to Classify Treading Water Movement Patterns.

Authors:  Christophe Schnitzler; Chris Button; James L Croft; Ludovic Seifert
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  The impact of a prescription review and prescriber feedback system on prescribing practices in primary care clinics: a cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Wei Yin Lim; Amar Singh Hss; Li Meng Ng; Selva Rani John Jasudass; Sondi Sararaks; Paranthaman Vengadasalam; Lina Hashim; Ranjit Kaur Praim Singh
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Association of Marginalized Identities With Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Society and Gold Humanism Honor Society Membership Among Medical Students.

Authors:  Katherine A Hill; Mayur M Desai; Sarwat I Chaudhry; Mytien Nguyen; William McDade; Yunshan Xu; Fangyong Li; Tonya Fancher; Alexandria M Hajduk; Marjorie J Westervelt; Dowin Boatright
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01

10.  Online self-assessment tool in Biochemistry - A medical student's perception during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Anusha Raja Jagadeesan; Rajeev Roy Neelakanta
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2021-05-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.