Literature DB >> 11478761

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of iron polymaltose complex and folic acid (Mumfer) vs iron formulation (ferrous fumarate) in female patients with anaemia.

P S Reddy1, B B Adsul, K Gandewar, K M Korde, A Desai.   

Abstract

Treatment of iron deficiency anaemia with conventional oral preparations is handicapped by unpredictable haematological response in addition to potential for irritating gastrointestinal adverse events. Iron polymaltose complex (IPC), a novel oral iron formulation with better absorbability, predictable haematinic response and less side effects was compared with oral ferrous fumarate in 100 female patients with documented iron deficiency anaemia. Clinical parameters (pallor, weakness) as well as biochemical parameters (Hb, serum iron, total iron binding capacity) show favourable changes with IPC; the physician and patient assessment also favour IPC over ferrous fumarate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11478761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Med Assoc        ISSN: 0019-5847


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of efficacy, tolerability, and cost of iron polymaltose complex with ferrous sulphate in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in pregnant women.

Authors:  Lekha Saha; Promila Pandhi; Sarala Gopalan; Samir Malhotra; Pradip Kumar Saha
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2007-01-02

Review 2.  Ferrous versus ferric oral iron formulations for the treatment of iron deficiency: a clinical overview.

Authors:  Palacios Santiago
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-02

3.  Evaluation of ferric and ferrous iron therapies in women with iron deficiency anaemia.

Authors:  Ilhami Berber; Halit Diri; Mehmet Ali Erkurt; Ismet Aydogdu; Emin Kaya; Irfan Kuku
Journal:  Adv Hematol       Date:  2014-06-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.