Literature DB >> 11478119

Swinging on the pendulum. Shifting views of justice in human subjects research.

A Mastroianni, J Kahn.   

Abstract

Federal policies on human subjects research have performed a near-about face. In the 1970s, policies were motivated chiefly by a belief that subjects needed protection from the harms and risks of research. Now the driving concern is that patients, and the populations they represent, need access to the benefits of research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11478119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep        ISSN: 0093-0334            Impact factor:   2.683


  20 in total

1.  Research ethics committees and paternalism.

Authors:  S J L Edwards; S Kirchin; R Huxtable
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Addiction research ethics and the Belmont principles: do drug users have a different moral voice?

Authors:  Celia B Fisher
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 2.164

3.  The ethics and regulatory landscape of including vulnerable populations in pragmatic clinical trials.

Authors:  Mary Jane Welch; Rachel Lally; Jennifer E Miller; Stephanie Pittman; Lynda Brodsky; Arthur L Caplan; Gina Uhlenbrauck; Darcy M Louzao; James H Fischer; Benjamin Wilfond
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Research subjects with limited English proficiency: ethical and legal issues.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Caitlin W Jones
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Are the new EPA regulations concerning intentional exposure studies involving children overprotective?

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct

6.  Perceptions of risk in research participation among underserved minority drug users.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Slomka; Eric A Ratliff; Sheryl McCurdy; Sandra Timpson; Mark L Williams
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.164

7.  [The "weak and sensitive elements" of the pediatric and adolescents' clinical trials].

Authors:  Irene N Melamed
Journal:  Rev Bioet Derecho       Date:  2010-01

8.  The battering of informed consent.

Authors:  M Kottow
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Protecting and respecting the vulnerable: existing regulations or further protections?

Authors:  Stephanie R Solomon
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2013-02

Review 10.  The clinical investigator-subject relationship: a contextual approach.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 2.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.