Literature DB >> 11476919

Intracranial temperature elevation from diagnostic ultrasound.

S B Barnett1.   

Abstract

Tissues of the central nervous system are sensitive to damage by physical agents, such as heat and ultrasound. Exposure to pulsed spectral Doppler ultrasound can significantly heat biologic tissue because of the relatively high intensities used and the need to hold the beam stationary during examinations. This has significant implications for sensitive neural tissue such as that exposed during spectral Doppler flow studies of fetal cerebral vessels. Recent changes in the FDA regulation allow delivery of almost eight times higher intensity into the fetal brain by ultrasound devices that incorporate an approved real-time output display in their design. In this situation, ultrasound users are expected to assess the risk/benefit ratio based on their interpretation of equipment output displays (including the thermal index, TI) and an understanding of the significance of biologic effects. To assist in the assessment of potential thermally mediated bioeffects, a number of conclusions can be drawn from the published scientific literature: the amount of ultrasound-induced intracranial heating increases with gestational age and the development of fetal bone; pulsed spectral Doppler ultrasound can produce biologically significant heating in the fetal brain; the rate of heating near bone is rapid, with approximately 75% of the maximum heating occurring within 30 s; blood flow has minimal cooling effect on ultrasound-induced heating of the brain when insonated with narrow focused clinical beams; the threshold for irreversible damage in the developing embryo and fetal brain is exceeded when a temperature increase of 4 degrees C is maintained for 5 min; an ultrasound exposure that produces a temperature increase of up to 1.5 degrees C in 120 s does not elicit measurable electrophysiologic responses in fetal brain; for some exposure conditions, the thermal index (TI), as used in the FDA-approved output display standard, underestimates the extent of ultrasound-induced intracranial temperature increase.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11476919     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(01)00367-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  7 in total

1.  A model for estimating ultrasound attenuation along the propagation path to the fetus from backscattered waveforms.

Authors:  Timothy A Bigelow; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Knowledge of the bio-effects of ultrasound among physicians performing clinical ultrasonography: Results of a survey conducted by the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB).

Authors:  F Piscaglia; A G Tewelde; R Righini; A Gianstefani; F Calliada; L Bolondi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2009-01-14

3.  Association of Prenatal Ultrasonography and Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  N Paul Rosman; Rachel Vassar; Gheorghe Doros; James DeRosa; Allison Froman; Audrey DiMauro; Sherry Santiago; Jodi Abbott
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 16.193

4.  Evaluation of biological effects induced by diagnostic ultrasound in the rat foetal tissues.

Authors:  Irfan Karagöz; Aydan Biri; Figen Babacan; Mustafa Kavutçu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 3.396

5.  Iterative Curve Fitting of the Bioheat Transfer Equation for Thermocouple-Based Temperature Estimation In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Hermes A S Kamimura; Christian Aurup; Ethan V Bendau; Niloufar Saharkhiz; Min Gon Kim; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 6.  Cerebral Autoregulation, Brain Injury, and the Transitioning Premature Infant.

Authors:  Zachary A Vesoulis; Amit M Mathur
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Prenatal ultrasound and the risk of childhood brain tumour and its subtypes.

Authors:  K Stålberg; B Haglund; O Axelsson; S Cnattingius; S Pfeifer; H Kieler
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.