OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of i.m. P and 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-HPC) for luteal phase support, in patients undergoing IVF-ET cycles. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING:Patients undergoing IVF-ET in our Centers. PATIENT(S): The inclusion criteria were the use of GnRH down-regulation and aged <40 years. INTERVENTION(S): A total of 300 cycles were randomly treated with either 17-HPC (341 mg every 3 days) or P (50 mg daily). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The outcomes of IVF in both study groups were evaluated for biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, clinical pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy. RESULT(S): No difference was found in the main outcome parameters considered. CONCLUSION(S): Although the results of the study encourage the use of 17-HPC for luteal phase support in patients undergoing IVF-ET program, more studies are necessary to support the hypothesis that it can replace i.m. P-in-oil.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of i.m. P and 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-HPC) for luteal phase support, in patients undergoing IVF-ET cycles. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING:Patients undergoing IVF-ET in our Centers. PATIENT(S): The inclusion criteria were the use of GnRH down-regulation and aged <40 years. INTERVENTION(S): A total of 300 cycles were randomly treated with either 17-HPC (341 mg every 3 days) or P (50 mg daily). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The outcomes of IVF in both study groups were evaluated for biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, clinical pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy. RESULT(S): No difference was found in the main outcome parameters considered. CONCLUSION(S): Although the results of the study encourage the use of 17-HPC for luteal phase support in patients undergoing IVF-ET program, more studies are necessary to support the hypothesis that it can replace i.m. P-in-oil.
Authors: Michelle van der Linden; Karen Buckingham; Cindy Farquhar; Jan A M Kremer; Mostafa Metwally Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-07-07