Literature DB >> 11476372

The effect of proximal artery flow on the hemodynamics at the distal anastomosis of a vascular bypass graft: computational study.

S M Kute1, D A Vorp.   

Abstract

The formation of distal anastomotic intimal hyperplasia (IH), one common mode of bypass graft failure, has been shown to occur in the areas of disturbed flow particular to this site. The nature of theflow in the segment of artery proximal to the distal anastomosis varies from case to case depending on the clinical situation presented. A partial stenosis of a bypassed arterial segment may allow residual prograde flow through the proximal artery entering the distal anastomosis of the graft. A complete stenosis may allow for zero flow in the proximal artery segment or retrograde flow due to the presence of small collateral vessels upstream. Although a number of investigations on the hemodynamics at the distal anastomosis of an end-to-side bypass graft have been conducted, there has not been a uniform treatment of the proximal artery flow condition. As a result, direct comparison of results from study to study may not be appropriate. The purpose of this work was to perform a three-dimensional computational investigation to study the effect of the proximal artery flow condition (i.e., prograde, zero, and retrograde flow) on the hemodynamics at the distal end-to-side anastomosis. We used the finite volume method to solve the full Navier-Stokes equations for steady flow through an idealized geometry of the distal anastomosis. We calculated the flow field and local wall shear stress (WSS) and WSS gradient (WSSG) everywhere in the domain. We also calculated the severity parameter (SP), a quantification of hemodynamic variation, at the anastomosis. Our model showed a marked difference in both the magnitude and spatial distribution of WSS and WSSG. For example, the maximum WSS magnitude on the floor of the artery proximal to the anastomosis for the prograde and zero flow cases is 1.8 and 3.9 dynes/cm2, respectively, while it is increased to 10.3 dynes/cm2 in the retrograde flow case. Similarly, the maximum value of WSSG magnitude on thefloor of the artery proximal to the anastomosis for the prograde flow case is 4.9 dynes/cm3, while it is increased to 13.6 and 24.2 dynes/cm3, respectively, in the zero and retrograde flow cases. The value of SP is highest for the retrograde flow case (13.7 dynes/cm3) and 8.1 and 12.1 percent lower than this for the prograde (12.6 dynes/cm3) and zero (12.0 dynes/cm3) flow cases, respectively. Our model results suggest that the flow condition in the proximal artery is an important determinant of the hemodynamics at the distal anastomosis of end-to-side vascular bypass grafts. Because hemodynamic forces affect the response of vascular endothelial cells, the flow situation in the proximal artery may affect IH formation and, therefore, long-term graft patency. Since surgeons have some control over the flow condition in the proximal artery, results from this study could help determine which flow condition is clinically optimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11476372     DOI: 10.1115/1.1374203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  14 in total

1.  Effect of the degree of LAD stenosis on "competitive flow" and flow field characteristics in LIMA-to-LAD bypass surgery.

Authors:  Abigail Swillens; Marloes De Witte; Håvard Nordgaard; Lasse Løvstakken; Denis Van Loo; Bram Trachet; Jan Vierendeels; Patrick Segers
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  A new experimental system for the extended application of cyclic hydrostatic pressure to cell culture.

Authors:  Timothy M Maul; Douglas W Hamilton; Alejandro Nieponice; Lorenzo Soletti; David A Vorp
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Why Patencies of Femoropopliteal Bypass Grafts with Distal End-to-End Anastomosis are Comparable with End-to-Side Anastomosis.

Authors:  Marco Hoedt; Thien How; Paul Poyck; Cees Wittens
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 1.520

4.  Computer-Aided Patient-Specific Coronary Artery Graft Design Improvements Using CFD Coupled Shape Optimizer.

Authors:  Onur Dur; Sinan Tolga Coskun; Kasim Oguz Coskun; David Frakes; Levent Burak Kara; Kerem Pekkan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 2.495

5.  Numerical Simulation of Physiological Blood Flow in 2-way Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts.

Authors:  Aike Qiao; Youjun Liu; Siyang Li; Hu Zhao
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.365

6.  A novel in vitro flow system for changing flow direction on endothelial cells.

Authors:  Chong Wang; Hao Lu; Martin Alexander Schwartz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Influence of residual coronary flow on bypass graft flow for graft assessment using near-infrared fluorescence angiography.

Authors:  Masaki Yamamoto; Hitoshi Ninomiya; Kohei Miyashita; Miwa Tashiro; Kazumasa Orihashi; Keiji Inoue; Takayuki Sato; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Expression of versican isoform V3 in the absence of ascorbate improves elastogenesis in engineered vascular constructs.

Authors:  Paul A Keire; Nicolas L'Heureux; Robert B Vernon; Mervyn J Merrilees; Barry Starcher; Elena Okon; Nathalie Dusserre; Todd N McAllister; Thomas N Wight
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Endothelial cell sensing of flow direction.

Authors:  Chong Wang; Brendon M Baker; Christopher S Chen; Martin Alexander Schwartz
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 8.311

10.  Axial stent strut angle influences wall shear stress after stent implantation: analysis using 3D computational fluid dynamics models of stent foreshortening.

Authors:  John F LaDisa; Lars E Olson; Douglas A Hettrick; David C Warltier; Judy R Kersten; Paul S Pagel
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.