Literature DB >> 11475540

The clinical efficiency of self-ligated brackets.

J Berger1, F K Byloff.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11475540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthod        ISSN: 0022-3875


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review on self-ligating vs. conventional brackets: initial pain, number of visits, treatment time.

Authors:  Ales Čelar; Magdalena Schedlberger; Petra Dörfler; Michael Bertl
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Comparative assessment of dental and basal arch dimensions of passive and active self-ligating versus conventional appliances : A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mohannad M Alabdullah; Ahmad S Burhan; Alaa Nabawia; Fehmieh Nawaya; Humam Saltaji
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Comparison of root resorption between self-ligating and conventional preadjusted brackets using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Vanessa Leite; Ana Claudia Conti; Ricardo Navarro; Marcio Almeida; Paula Oltramari-Navarro; Renato Almeida
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions.

Authors:  Sérgio Ricardo Jakob; Davison Matheus; Maria Cristina Jimenez-Pellegrin; Cecília Pedroso Turssi; Flávia Lucisano Botelho Amaral
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 May-Jun

5.  Comparison of self-ligating Damon3 and conventional MBT brackets regarding alignment efficiency and pain experience: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Arezoo Jahanbin; Nadia Hasanzadeh; Sara Khaki; Hooman Shafaee
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2019
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.