Literature DB >> 11475076

[Antigranulocyte scintigraphy of septic loosening of hip endoprosthesis: effect of different methods of analysis].

R Klett1, D Steiner, M Puille, A Khalisi, H P Matter, H Stürz, R Bauer.   

Abstract

AIM: Diagnosis of infection with help of antigranulocyte scintigraphy near body stem is difficult because of contemporary visualisation of bone marrow. Therefore, we investigated, whether it is possible to improve the accuracy in diagnosing septic loosening of hip endoprosthesis by changing the analyzing methods.
METHODS: In 28 patients, the results of a visual interpretation of late scan, a visual interpretation and a quantitative interpretation of time-activity-course were compared. These results were verified by histology respectively microbiology.
RESULTS: Histological and microbiological verification found 14 septic loosening and 14 aseptic loosening of the hip prothesis. Therefore, sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value for the visual interpretation of late scan were 0.86, 0.57, 0.80 and 0.67. For visual and quantitative interpretation of time-activity-course we found 0.86, 0.79, 0.85 and 0.80 respectively 1, 0.93, 1, 0.93. For interobserver agreement we found kappa coefficients of 0.28 +/- 0.2 for visual interpretation of late scan, 0.48 +/- 0.17 for visual interpretation and 1.0 +/- 0 for quantitative interpretation of time-activity-course.
CONCLUSION: In all investigated values quantitative interpretation of time-activity-course was superior to the other analyzing methods. Therefore, antigranulocyte scintigraphy for septic loosening of hip endoprosthesis should be interpreted quantitatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11475076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nuklearmedizin        ISSN: 0029-5566            Impact factor:   1.379


  2 in total

1.  Immunoscintigraphy of septic loosening of knee endoprosthesis: a retrospective evaluation of the antigranulocyte antibody BW 250/183.

Authors:  Rigobert Klett; Jens Kordelle; Ulrich Stahl; Alexander Khalisi; Maximillian Puille; Dagmar Steiner; Richard Bauer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Nuclear medicine and the failed joint replacement: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Christopher J Palestro
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.