Literature DB >> 11474868

Phenotypes including immunocompetence in scavenging local chicken ecotypes in Tanzania.

P L Msoffe1, U M Minga, J E Olsen, M G Yongolo, H R Juul-Madsen, P S Gwakisa, M M Mtambo.   

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine the variations in physical characters and immunocompetence among scavenging local chicken ecotypes in Tanzania. Eighty-four adult scavenging local chickens from four eco-climatic regions of Tanzania were studied. Measurements of adult body weight, body length, shank length and egg weight and observations of plumage colour and pattern, earlobe colour, skin colour and the shape of the comb were conducted. The antibody response to sheep red blood cells, serum haemolytic complement and the cutaneous response to phytohaemagglutinin-P were assessed. Five ecotypes were identified and named Mbeya, Morogoro-medium, Ching'wekwe, Kuchi and Singamagazi. Singamagazi and Kuchi were significantly heavier, with longer shanks and heavier eggs than the other ecotypes. The average adult body weight for males ranged from 1621 g (Mbeya) to 2915 g (Singamagazi). Average female weights ranged from 1108 g (Morogoro-medium) to 2020 g (Singamagazi). Mean egg weights ranged from 37.65 g (Ching'wekwe) to 45.61 (Singamagazi). The Kuchi had mostly rose and walnut combs, while the other ecotypes were mostly single combed. In each ecotype there were chickens with a high or low antibody response to red blood cells, but there was a significant difference between the ecotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11474868     DOI: 10.1023/a:1010544221028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of cell-mediated, cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity in young chickens by an interdigital skin test.

Authors:  D E Corrier; J R DeLoach
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  The effect of storage at low temperature on the haemolytic complement activity of chicken serum.

Authors:  F Demey; V S Pandey; R Baelmans; G Agbede; A Verhulst
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Influence of a purified grade of pentachlorophenol on the immune response of chickens.

Authors:  C A Prescott; B N Wilkie; B Hunter; R J Julian
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 1.156

4.  Production and persistence of antibodies in chickens to sheep erythrocytes. 2. Resistance to infectious diseases.

Authors:  W G Gross; P B Siegel; R W Hall; C H Domermuth; R T DuBoise
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Genetic analysis of immunocompetence measures in a White Leghorn chicken line.

Authors:  S Cheng; S J Lamont
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Resistance to Salmonella gallinarum, S. pullorum, and S. enteritidis in inbred lines of chickens.

Authors:  N Bumstead; P Barrow
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1993 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.577

  6 in total
  10 in total

1.  Morphobiometrical characteristics of indigenous chicken ecotype populations in Rwanda.

Authors:  R Habimana; K Ngeno; J Mahoro; M Ntawubizi; F Shumbusho; M Manzi; C A Hirwa; T O Okeno
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Different serum haemolytic complement levels in indigenous chickens from Benin, Bolivia, Cameroon, India and Tanzania.

Authors:  R Baelmans; H K Parmentier; H M J Udo; P Dorny; F Demey; D Berkvens
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Haemolytic complement activity and humoral immune responses to sheep red blood cells in indigenous chickens and in eight German Dahlem Red chicken lines with different combinations of major genes (dwarf, naked neck and frizzled) of tropical interest.

Authors:  R Baelmans; H K Parmentier; M G B Nieuwland; P Dorny; F Demey; D Berkvens
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Choice of breeding stock, preference of production traits and culling criteria of village chickens among Zimbabwe agro-ecological zones.

Authors:  F C Muchadeyi; C B A Wollny; H Eding; S Weigend; H Simianer
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 1.559

5.  Comparative pathogenesis of experimental infections with Salmonella gallinarum in local and commercial chickens.

Authors:  R H Mdegela; P L M Msoffe; R W Waihenya; J C Kasanga; M M A Mtambo; U M Minga; J E Olsen
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.559

6.  Phenotypic variation of native chicken populations in northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Hassen Halima; F W C Neser; E van Marle-Koster; A de Kock
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.559

7.  Genetic diversity of Saudi native chicken breeds segregating for naked neck and frizzle genes using microsatellite markers.

Authors:  Moataz Fathi; Mohamed El-Zarei; Ibrahim Al-Homidan; Osama Abou-Emera
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.509

8.  The Comparison between Tanzanian Indigenous (Ufipa Breed) and Commercial Broiler (Ross Chicken) Meat on the Physicochemical Characteristics, Collagen and Nucleic Acid Contents.

Authors:  Ngassa Julius Mussa; Suma Fahamu Kibonde; Wuttigrai Boonkum; Vibuntita Chankitisakul
Journal:  Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2022-09-01

9.  Reconstructing the origin and dispersal patterns of village chickens across East Africa: insights from autosomal markers.

Authors:  J M Mwacharo; K Nomura; H Hanada; J L Han; T Amano; O Hanotte
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Phenotypic variability and population structure analysis of Tanzanian free-range local chickens.

Authors:  James R Mushi; Gaspar H Chiwanga; Esinam N Amuzu-Aweh; Muhammed Walugembe; Robert A Max; Susan J Lamont; Terra R Kelly; Esther L Mollel; Peter L Msoffe; Jack Dekkers; Rodrigo Gallardo; Huaijun Zhou; Amandus P Muhairwa
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.741

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.