Literature DB >> 11474763

Effects of computer monitor viewing angle and related factors on strain, performance, and preference outcomes.

C M Sommerich1, S M Joines, J P Psihogios.   

Abstract

A model of visual and musculoskeletal strain associated with computer monitor placement was developed. The main premise of which is that monitor placement decisions must take into consideration development of both visual and musculoskeletal strains. Certain factors in the model that were thought to affect one or both types of strain. or that were considered important to rule out for effect, were tested in a lab setting. These factors were viewing angle (eye level, midlevel, low level), monitor size (14 in., 19 in.), keyboard familiarity (touch typist, nontouch typist), and task (reading, mousing, typing). Outcomes included indicators of visual and musculoskeletal strain, preference, and performance. Muscle activity was generally greater for the low viewing angle, for the standard monitor (14 in.), and for non-touch typists. Participants preferred the midlevel placement. Task performance was slightly diminished with eye-level placement. Results are interpreted in relation to the model and to several hypotheses that were formed to focus the inquiry. Actual or potential applications of this research include monitor placement decisions in the design or modification of computer workstations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11474763     DOI: 10.1518/001872001775992480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  7 in total

1.  Real-time occupational stress and fatigue measurement in medical imaging practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth Krupinski; Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  A field intervention examining the impact of an office ergonomics training and a highly adjustable chair on visual symptoms in a public sector organization.

Authors:  Benjamin C Amick; Cammie Chaumont Menéndez; Lianna Bazzani; Michelle Robertson; Kelly DeRango; Ted Rooney; Anne Moore
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  The modulation of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders for a knowledge worker with chiropractic care and applied ergonomics: a case study.

Authors:  Charles W Sherrod; George Casey; Robert E Dubro; Dale F Johnson
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2013-03

4.  Ocular surface area and human eye blink frequency during VDU work: the effect of monitor position and task.

Authors:  Pernille Kofoed Nielsen; Karen Søgaard; Jørgen Skotte; Peder Wolkoff
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines.

Authors:  M J van Det; W J H J Meijerink; C Hoff; E R Totté; J P E N Pierie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Gaze and viewing angle influence visual stabilization of upright posture.

Authors:  Ki Ustinova; J Perkins
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  [Semi-quantitative ergonomic analysis of the biomechanical constraints within the cervical spine among screen-operators in the Tunisian universities].

Authors:  Amira Omrane; Olfa Jlassi; Salma Kammoun; Ines Tka; Awatef Kraiem; Mohamed Adnène Henchi; Taoufik Khalfallah; Lamia Bouzgarrou
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2018-11-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.