Literature DB >> 11473940

Prognostic value of Y deletion analysis. The role of current methods.

C Foresta1, E Moro, A Ferlin.   

Abstract

Y chromosome microdeletions represent the most frequent genetic alteration in azoospermic and severely oligozoospermic men, and screening for microdeletions in AZFa, b and c are routinely performed in the major andrology and infertility centres. Since patients with Y microdeletions often require intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), the question of whether the type of the microdeletion present could have prognostic value for the presence of spermatozoa in the ejaculate or in the testes [by testicular sperm extraction (TESE)] is an interesting one. The review of the literature on this topic showed that there is still no clear genotype--phenotype relationship, i.e. similar testicular alterations may be caused by different types of microdeletions, and apparently identical microdeletions may be associated with diverse tubular damage. Even in azoospermic men, the localization of the microdeletion cannot be used as a valid prognostic parameter before TESE--ICSI to identify patients with spermatozoa in their testes. The only finding with absolute negative prognostic value is the presence of complete AZFa--c deletions, which are invariably associated with an absence of spermatozoa. Microdeletions in AZFa or AZFb seem to have promising prognostic value, but more data and gene-specific deletions have to be provided to draw clear conclusions. The absence of a clear genotype--phenotype relationship, and therefore of a prognostic value of Y deletion analysis, is probably due to the current methods used for the screening of the microdeletions. In fact, to date most centres do not use gene-specific markers but instead use anonymous primers that contribute little information to the pathogenic role of the microdeletions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11473940     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.8.1543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  13 in total

1.  Effects of clinical, laboratuary and pathological features on successful sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Çağrı Güneri; Turgut Alkibay; Lütfi Tunç
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-09

Review 2.  Function of the sex chromosomes in mammalian fertility.

Authors:  Edith Heard; James Turner
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Associations of Y-chromosome subdeletion gr/gr with the prevalence of Y-chromosome haplogroups in infertile patients.

Authors:  Mohammad Shahid; Varinderpal S Dhillon; Hesham Saleh Khalil; Anubha Sexana; Syed Akhtar Husain
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  The molecular evolution of PL10 homologs.

Authors:  Ti-Cheng Chang; Wan-Sheng Liu
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Y chromosome AZFc microdeletion may not affect the outcomes of ICSI for infertile males with fresh ejaculated sperm.

Authors:  Xiao-hong Liu; Jie Qiao; Rong Li; Li-ying Yan; Li-xue Chen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Detection of Y Chromosome Microdeletion is Valuable in the Treatment of Patients With Nonobstructive Azoospermia and Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia: Sperm Retrieval Rate and Birth Rate.

Authors:  Don Kyung Choi; In Hyuck Gong; Jin Ho Hwang; Jong Jin Oh; Jae Yup Hong
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-02-18

Review 7.  Azoospermia factor and male infertility.

Authors:  Eitetsu Koh; Ho-Su Sin; Masato Fukushima; Mikio Namiki
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2010-06-17

8.  The human Y chromosome's azoospermia factor b (AZFb) region: sequence, structure, and deletion analysis in infertile men.

Authors:  A Ferlin; E Moro; A Rossi; B Dallapiccola; C Foresta
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  The significance of Y chromosome microdeletion analysis in subfertile men with clinical variocele.

Authors:  Levent Sagnak; Hamit Ersoy; Ugur Ozok; Asir Eraslan; Kanay Yararbas; Goksel Goktug; Ajlan Tukun
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.318

10.  Comparative Evolution of Duplicated Ddx3 Genes in Teleosts: Insights from Japanese Flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus.

Authors:  Zhongkai Wang; Wei Liu; Huayu Song; Huizhen Wang; Jinxiang Liu; Haitao Zhao; Xinxin Du; Quanqi Zhang
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.