Literature DB >> 11473486

Differences in lymph drainage between swollen and non-swollen regions in arms with breast-cancer-related lymphoedema.

A W Stanton1, W E Svensson, R H Mellor, A M Peters, J R Levick, P S Mortimer.   

Abstract

Recent research indicates that the pathophysiology of breast-cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) is more complex than simple axillary lymphatic obstruction as a result of the cancer treatment. Uneven distribution of swelling (involvement of the mid-arm region is common, but the hand is often spared) is puzzling. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that local differences in lymphatic drainage contribute to the regionality of the oedema. Using lymphoscintigraphy, we measured the removal rate constant, k (representing local lymph flow per unit distribution volume, VD), for 99mTc-labelled human immunoglobulin G in the oedematous proximal forearm, and in the hand (finger web) in women in whom the hand was unaffected. Tracer was injected subcutaneously, and the depot plus the rest of the arm was monitored with a gamma-radiation camera for up to 6 h. VD was assessed from image width. Contralateral arms served as controls. k was 25% lower in oedematous forearm tissue than in the control arm (BCRL, -0.070+/-0.026% x min(-1); control, -0.093+/-0.028% x min(-1); mean+/-S.D.; P=0.012) and VD was greater. In the non-oedematous hand of the BCRL arm, k was 18% higher than in the control hand (BCRL, -0.110+/-0.027% x min(-1); control, -0.095+/-0.028% x min(-1); P=0.057) and 59% higher than forearm k on the BCRL side (P=0.0014). VD did not differ between the hands. Images of the BCRL arm following hand injection showed diffuse activity in the superficial tissues, sometimes extending almost to the shoulder. A possible interpretation is that the hand is spared in some patients because local lymph flow is increased and diverted along collateral dermal routes. The results support the hypothesis that regional differences in surviving lymphatic function contribute to the distribution of swelling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11473486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)        ISSN: 0143-5221            Impact factor:   6.124


  19 in total

1.  Effects of dynamic and static handgrip exercises on hand and wrist volume.

Authors:  Junichiro Yamauchi; Alan Hargens
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Segmental blood flow and hemodynamic state of lymphedematous and nonlymphedematous arms.

Authors:  Leslie D Montgomery; Mary S Dietrich; Jane M Armer; B R Stewart; Sheila H Ridner
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.589

3.  Hand Edema in Patients at Risk of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Health Professionals Should Take Notice.

Authors:  Cheryl L Brunelle; Meyha N Swaroop; Melissa N Skolny; Maria S Asdourian; Hoda E Sayegh; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2018-06-01

4.  Predicting monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics following subcutaneous administration via whole-body physiologically-based modeling.

Authors:  Shihao Hu; David Z D'Argenio
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Regional distribution of epifascial swelling and epifascial lymph drainage rate constants in breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Stephanie Modi; Anthony W B Stanton; Russell H Mellor; A Michael Peters; J Rodney Levick; Peter S Mortimer
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.589

6.  Breast cancer-related lymphedema: women's experiences with an underestimated condition.

Authors:  Roanne Thomas-MacLean; Baukje Miedema; Sue R Tatemichi
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Finding an optimal method for imaging lymphatic vessels of the upper limb.

Authors:  Susan O'Mahony; Sarah L Rose; Alison J Chilvers; James R Ballinger; Chandra K Solanki; Robert W Barber; Peter S Mortimer; Arnie D Purushotham; A Michael Peters
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Development of breast cancer-related lymphedema: is it dependent on the patient, the tumor or the treating physicians?

Authors:  Basem Morcos; Firas Al Ahmad; Iyad Anabtawi; Abdel Munem Abu Sba'; Hisham Shabani; Rawya Yaseen
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Association between lymphedema self-care adherence and lymphedema outcomes among women with breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Justin C Brown; Anagha Kumar; Andrea L Cheville; Julia C Tchou; Andrea B Troxel; Susan R Harris; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.159

10.  Human lymphatic pumping measured in healthy and lymphoedematous arms by lymphatic congestion lymphoscintigraphy.

Authors:  S Modi; A W B Stanton; W E Svensson; A M Peters; P S Mortimer; J R Levick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.