Literature DB >> 11473162

Characterization of ocular surface symptoms from optometric practices in North America.

C G Begley1, R L Chalmers, G L Mitchell, K K Nichols, B Caffery, T Simpson, R DuToit, J Portello, L Davis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study characterized ocular symptoms typical of dry eye in an unselected optometric clinical population in the United States and Canada.
METHODS: Self-administered dry eye questionnaires, one for non-contact lens wearers (dry eye questionnaire) and one for contact lens wearers (contact lens dry eye questionnaire), were completed at six clinical sites in North America. Both questionnaires included categoric scales to measure the prevalence, frequency, diurnal severity, and intrusiveness of nine ocular surface symptoms. The questionnaires also asked how much these ocular symptoms affected daily activities and contained questions about computer use, medications, and allergies. The examining doctors, who were masked to questionnaire responses, recorded a nondirected dry eye diagnosis for each patient, based on their own diagnostic criteria.
RESULTS: The dry eye questionnaires were completed by 1,054 patients. The most common ocular symptom was discomfort, with 64% of non--contact lens wearers and 79% of contact lens wearers reporting the symptom at least infrequently. There was a diurnal increase in the intensity of many symptoms, with symptoms such as discomfort, dryness, and visual changes reported to be more intense in the evening. The 22% percent of non-contact lens wearers and 15% of contact lens wearers diagnosed with dry eye (most in the mild to moderate categories) reported symptoms at a greater frequency than those not diagnosed with dry eye.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that symptoms of ocular irritation and visual disturbances were relatively common in this unselected clinical population. The intensity of many ocular symptoms increased late in the day, which suggested that environmental factors played a role in the etiology of the symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11473162     DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200108000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  35 in total

1.  Effect of contact lenses on the protein composition in tear film: a ProteinChip study.

Authors:  Christina Kramann; Nils Boehm; Katrin Lorenz; Nelli Wehrwein; Bernhard M Stoffelns; Norbert Pfeiffer; Franz H Grus
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Eye complaints in the office environment: precorneal tear film integrity influenced by eye blinking efficiency.

Authors:  P Wolkoff; J K Nøjgaard; P Troiano; B Piccoli
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the subcommittee on neurobiology.

Authors:  Fiona Stapleton; Carl Marfurt; Blanka Golebiowski; Mark Rosenblatt; David Bereiter; Carolyn Begley; Darlene Dartt; Juana Gallar; Carlos Belmonte; Pedram Hamrah; Mark Willcox
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Meibomian gland loss due to trabeculectomy.

Authors:  Hideto Sagara; Tetsuju Sekiryu; Hiroki Noji; Masashi Ogasawara; Yukinori Sugano; Hiroko Horikiri
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Measurement of the time course of optical quality and visual deterioration during tear break-up.

Authors:  Haixia Liu; Larry Thibos; Carolyn G Begley; Arthur Bradley
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Effects of osmolarity on human epithelial conjunctival cells using an electrical technique.

Authors:  Mariela Bellotti; Walter Bast; Alejandro Berra; Fabian J Bonetto
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 7.  TFOS DEWS II pain and sensation report.

Authors:  Carlos Belmonte; Jason J Nichols; Stephanie M Cox; James A Brock; Carolyn G Begley; David A Bereiter; Darlene A Dartt; Anat Galor; Pedram Hamrah; Jason J Ivanusic; Deborah S Jacobs; Nancy A McNamara; Mark I Rosenblatt; Fiona Stapleton; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 8.  A review of quality of life measures in dry eye questionnaires.

Authors:  Joseph R Grubbs; Sue Tolleson-Rinehart; Kyle Huynh; Richard M Davis
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 9.  Dry eye disease and microbial keratitis: is there a connection?

Authors:  Srihari Narayanan; Rachel L Redfern; William L Miller; Kelly K Nichols; Alison M McDermott
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  Treatment, material, care, and patient-related factors in contact lens-related dry eye.

Authors:  Padmapriya Ramamoorthy; Loraine T Sinnott; Jason J Nichols
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.