OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between marital relationship domains (i.e., intimacy and adjustment) and glycemic control and psychosocial adaptation to diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 78 insulin-treated adults with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes were assessed on a single occasion. They completed two marital quality measures (Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale and Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships Scale) and four quality-of-life measures (Diabetes Quality of Life Scale, Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey, Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale). Glycemic control was assessed by HbA(1c). Demographic data (age, sex, type and duration of diabetes, years married, other medical conditions, family history, disability, and years of education) were gathered from the chart and questionnaires. RESULTS: Concerning psychosocial adaptation, both of the marital quality measures were predictors of aspects of adaptation. Better marital satisfaction was related to higher levels of diabetes-related satisfaction and less impact, as well as less diabetes-related distress and better general quality of life. Higher levels of marital intimacy were related to better diabetes-specific and general quality of life. Concerning glycemic control, there was a nonsignificant trend for marital adjustment scores to relate to HbA(1c) (P = 0.0568). CONCLUSIONS: For insulin-treated adults with diabetes, quality of marriage is associated with adaptation to diabetes and other aspects of health-related quality of life. The suggestive finding that marital adjustment may relate to glycemic control warrants further study. Future work should also explore the impact of couples-focused interventions on adaptation, adherence, and glycemic control.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between marital relationship domains (i.e., intimacy and adjustment) and glycemic control and psychosocial adaptation to diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 78 insulin-treated adults with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes were assessed on a single occasion. They completed two marital quality measures (Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale and Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships Scale) and four quality-of-life measures (Diabetes Quality of Life Scale, Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey, Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale). Glycemic control was assessed by HbA(1c). Demographic data (age, sex, type and duration of diabetes, years married, other medical conditions, family history, disability, and years of education) were gathered from the chart and questionnaires. RESULTS: Concerning psychosocial adaptation, both of the marital quality measures were predictors of aspects of adaptation. Better marital satisfaction was related to higher levels of diabetes-related satisfaction and less impact, as well as less diabetes-related distress and better general quality of life. Higher levels of marital intimacy were related to better diabetes-specific and general quality of life. Concerning glycemic control, there was a nonsignificant trend for marital adjustment scores to relate to HbA(1c) (P = 0.0568). CONCLUSIONS: For insulin-treated adults with diabetes, quality of marriage is associated with adaptation to diabetes and other aspects of health-related quality of life. The suggestive finding that marital adjustment may relate to glycemic control warrants further study. Future work should also explore the impact of couples-focused interventions on adaptation, adherence, and glycemic control.
Authors: Joshua R Novak; Jared R Anderson; Matthew D Johnson; Nathan R Hardy; Ann Walker; Allison Wilcox; Virginia L Lewis; David C Robbins Journal: Appl Psychol Health Well Being Date: 2017-04-12
Authors: Mallory O Johnson; Samantha E Dilworth; Jonelle M Taylor; Lynae A Darbes; Megan L Comfort; Torsten B Neilands Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2012-08
Authors: Mohamad Adam Bujang; Mastura Ismail; Nur Khairul Bariyyah Mohd Hatta; Siti Haslina Othman; Nurakmal Baharum; Siti Sara Mat Lazim Journal: Malays J Med Sci Date: 2017-08-18
Authors: Marina Taloyan; Alexandre Wajngot; Sven-Erik Johansson; Jonas Tovi; Jan Sundquist Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-09-08 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Paula M Trief; Lawrence Fisher; Jonathan Sandberg; Donald A Cibula; Jacqueline Dimmock; Danielle M Hessler; Patricia Forken; Ruth S Weinstock Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 19.112