E B Waters1, L A Salmon, M Wake, M Wright, K D Hesketh. 1. Centre for Community Child Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia. waterse@cryptic.rch.unimelb.edu.au
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate a new generic measure of adolescent health status, the self-report version of the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ), and provide population-based data. Furthermore, we aimed to examine the impact of common adolescent illness and health concerns on their health and well-being. METHODS: A stratified, two-stage, random cluster sampling design was used to obtain a cross-sectional sample of subjects through schools. A written questionnaire included the 80-item 12-scale self-report CHQ and items measuring health concerns, illnesses/health conditions, and sociodemographics. RESULTS: A total of 2361 adolescents participated (response rate of 70%). Reliability was high: Tests of internal consistency and discriminant validity reported 90% of item-scale correlations >.4; all scales had Cronbach alpha coefficients >.7. Adolescents with illnesses/conditions or health concerns reported lower scores and larger differences for content-related scales, supporting content and construct validity. Statistically significant age and gender trends were observed for Mental Health, Self-Esteem, General Health, and Family Cohesion scales. Health status worsened as health concerns increased (X(2) linear trend, p =.00) with deterioration in health of 5-20% on all scales for emotional health concerns (40% of sample). CONCLUSIONS: The self-report CHQ is a reliable and seemingly valid measure of health and well-being for adolescent health research, although additional measures may be required where scales have high ceiling values. The significantly lower scores reported by adolescents with illness and/or health concerns lend support to the use of standardized health measures and longitudinal research to further examine the impact of adolescent comorbidities and their causal determinants.
PURPOSE: To evaluate a new generic measure of adolescent health status, the self-report version of the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ), and provide population-based data. Furthermore, we aimed to examine the impact of common adolescent illness and health concerns on their health and well-being. METHODS: A stratified, two-stage, random cluster sampling design was used to obtain a cross-sectional sample of subjects through schools. A written questionnaire included the 80-item 12-scale self-report CHQ and items measuring health concerns, illnesses/health conditions, and sociodemographics. RESULTS: A total of 2361 adolescents participated (response rate of 70%). Reliability was high: Tests of internal consistency and discriminant validity reported 90% of item-scale correlations >.4; all scales had Cronbach alpha coefficients >.7. Adolescents with illnesses/conditions or health concerns reported lower scores and larger differences for content-related scales, supporting content and construct validity. Statistically significant age and gender trends were observed for Mental Health, Self-Esteem, General Health, and Family Cohesion scales. Health status worsened as health concerns increased (X(2) linear trend, p =.00) with deterioration in health of 5-20% on all scales for emotional health concerns (40% of sample). CONCLUSIONS: The self-report CHQ is a reliable and seemingly valid measure of health and well-being for adolescent health research, although additional measures may be required where scales have high ceiling values. The significantly lower scores reported by adolescents with illness and/or health concerns lend support to the use of standardized health measures and longitudinal research to further examine the impact of adolescent comorbidities and their causal determinants.
Authors: Hein Raat; Anita M Botterweck; Jeanne M Landgraf; W Christina Hoogeveen; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Michaela Dellenmark-Blom; John Eric Chaplin; Vladimir Gatzinsky; Linus Jönsson; Kate Abrahamson Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Ronette L Kolotkin; Meg Zeller; Avani C Modi; Gregory P Samsa; Nicole Polanichka Quinlan; Jack A Yanovski; Stephen K Bell; David M Maahs; Daniela Gonzales de Serna; Helmut R Roehrig Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: D Korolija; S Sauerland; S Wood-Dauphinée; C C Abbou; E Eypasch; M García Caballero; M A Lumsden; B Millat; J R T Monson; G Nilsson; R Pointner; W Schwenk; A Shamiyeh; A Szold; E Targarona; B Ure; E Neugebauer Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2004-04-27 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Tara Karamlou; Jeffrey A Poynter; Henry L Walters; Jonathan Rhodes; Igor Bondarenko; Sara K Pasquali; Stephanie M Fuller; Linda M Lambert; Eugene H Blackstone; Marshall L Jacobs; Kim Duncan; Christopher A Caldarone; William G Williams; Brian W McCrindle Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Michael G Sawyer; Katherine E Reynolds; Jennifer J Couper; Davina J French; Declan Kennedy; James Martin; Rima Staugas; Tahereh Ziaian; Peter A Baghurst Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.147