BACKGROUND: Our aims were to develop a Spanish version of the short portable mental status questionnaire (SPMSQ) (Pfeiffer's test) and to validate the resultant Spanish version of the test among a general population aged 65 years or older. PATIENTS, MATERIAL AND METHODS: First, we developed the Spanish version of the SPMSQ by means of a cross-cultural adaptation methodology. Patients were the assessed by independent teams in two sessions the same day. The first team (two trained psychiatrists and one trained family physician) carried out a standardised neuropsychological assessment to diagnose cognitive impairment/dementia according to ICD-10 criteria which was regarded as the reference "gold standard" to calculate validity parameters (sensitivity and specificity). The second team (family physicians/nurses) assessed the presence of cognitive impairment with the Spanish version of the SPMSQ. RESULTS: 255 subjects (66.7%, females) underwent the assessment. Mean age was 74.5 years and 65.5% of them were illiterate. The inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability of the SPMSQ Spanish version were 0.738 (p < 0.001), and 0.925 (p < 0.001), respectively,with a convergent validity of 0.74 (p < 0.001) and a discriminant validity of 0.230 (p < 0.001). The internal consistency was high with an *value of 0.82. The area under the ROC curve was 0.89. Sensitivity and specificity were 85.7 and 79.3, respectively (cut-off of 3 or more). CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the SPMSQ test has a good reliability and validity. For clinical use, a cut-off of 3 appears to be most useful. When illiterate patients are assessed, the it is recommended to employ a cut-off of 4 or more.
BACKGROUND: Our aims were to develop a Spanish version of the short portable mental status questionnaire (SPMSQ) (Pfeiffer's test) and to validate the resultant Spanish version of the test among a general population aged 65 years or older. PATIENTS, MATERIAL AND METHODS: First, we developed the Spanish version of the SPMSQ by means of a cross-cultural adaptation methodology. Patients were the assessed by independent teams in two sessions the same day. The first team (two trained psychiatrists and one trained family physician) carried out a standardised neuropsychological assessment to diagnose cognitive impairment/dementia according to ICD-10 criteria which was regarded as the reference "gold standard" to calculate validity parameters (sensitivity and specificity). The second team (family physicians/nurses) assessed the presence of cognitive impairment with the Spanish version of the SPMSQ. RESULTS: 255 subjects (66.7%, females) underwent the assessment. Mean age was 74.5 years and 65.5% of them were illiterate. The inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability of the SPMSQ Spanish version were 0.738 (p < 0.001), and 0.925 (p < 0.001), respectively,with a convergent validity of 0.74 (p < 0.001) and a discriminant validity of 0.230 (p < 0.001). The internal consistency was high with an *value of 0.82. The area under the ROC curve was 0.89. Sensitivity and specificity were 85.7 and 79.3, respectively (cut-off of 3 or more). CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the SPMSQ test has a good reliability and validity. For clinical use, a cut-off of 3 appears to be most useful. When illiterate patients are assessed, the it is recommended to employ a cut-off of 4 or more.
Authors: Julio Cabrero-García; Carmen Luz Muñoz-Mendoza; María José Cabañero-Martínez; Lorena González-Llopís; Juan Diego Ramos-Pichardo; Abilio Reig-Ferrer Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 1.137
Authors: M Díaz de Bustamante; T Alarcón; R Menéndez-Colino; R Ramírez-Martín; Á Otero; J I González-Montalvo Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: María Benito-de-Pedro; César Calvo-Lobo; Daniel López-López; Ana Isabel Benito-de-Pedro; Carlos Romero-Morales; Marta San-Antolín; Davinia Vicente-Campos; David Rodríguez-Sanz Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Cristina González de Villaumbrosia; Pilar Sáez López; Isaac Martín de Diego; Carmen Lancho Martín; Marina Cuesta Santa Teresa; Teresa Alarcón; Cristina Ojeda Thies; Rocío Queipo Matas; Juan Ignacio González-Montalvo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Victoria Arija; Núria Martín; Teresa Canela; Carme Anguera; Ana I Castelao; Montserrat García-Barco; Antoni García-Campo; Ana I González-Bravo; Carme Lucena; Teresa Martínez; Silvia Fernández-Barrés; Roser Pedret; Waleska Badia; Josep Basora Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 3.295