S Petersen1, G Henke, M Freitag, A Faulhaber, K Ludwig. 1. Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, General Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Teaching Hospital University Dresden, Germany. petersen-sv@khdf.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of prosthetic infection in incisional hernia repairs, to determine whether there are any factors associated with prosthetic infection and to describe the clinical outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. SETTING: Teaching hospital, Germany. SUBJECTS: 121 consecutive patients who underwent incisional hernia repair in our department from December 1994 to December 1999. INTERVENTION: Hernia repair by implantation of an alloplastic prosthesis by the Stoppa-Rives technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative deep prosthetic infection and associated factors. RESULTS: All 121 patients had the mesh implanted in the subfascial plane, 77 had a polypropylene mesh (Prolene) (64%), 7 had a polyester mesh (Mersilene) (6%), and 37 patients had a expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch (ePTFE, Gore-Tex) (31%). Postoperatively the mesh became infected in 8 patients (7%), a mean of 4.5 months (range 0.5-16) after hernia repair. All three infected ePTFE patches had to be removed whereas drainage was sufficient treatment for the infected polypropylene and polyester meshes. CONCLUSION: Once a mesh infection is verified adequate drainage seems to be sufficient for polypropylene and polyester meshes but ePTFE patches should be removed.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of prosthetic infection in incisional hernia repairs, to determine whether there are any factors associated with prosthetic infection and to describe the clinical outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. SETTING: Teaching hospital, Germany. SUBJECTS: 121 consecutive patients who underwent incisional hernia repair in our department from December 1994 to December 1999. INTERVENTION: Hernia repair by implantation of an alloplastic prosthesis by the Stoppa-Rives technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative deep prosthetic infection and associated factors. RESULTS: All 121 patients had the mesh implanted in the subfascial plane, 77 had a polypropylene mesh (Prolene) (64%), 7 had a polyester mesh (Mersilene) (6%), and 37 patients had a expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch (ePTFE, Gore-Tex) (31%). Postoperatively the mesh became infected in 8 patients (7%), a mean of 4.5 months (range 0.5-16) after hernia repair. All three infected ePTFE patches had to be removed whereas drainage was sufficient treatment for the infected polypropylene and polyester meshes. CONCLUSION: Once a mesh infection is verified adequate drainage seems to be sufficient for polypropylene and polyester meshes but ePTFE patches should be removed.
Authors: S Levy; D Moszkowicz; T Poghosyan; A Beauchet; M -M Chandeze; K Vychnevskaia; F Peschaud; J -L Bouillot Journal: Hernia Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: Ali Rastegarpour; Michael Cheung; Madhurima Vardhan; Mohamed M Ibrahim; Charles E Butler; Howard Levinson Journal: Plast Surg (Oakv) Date: 2016 Impact factor: 0.947