Literature DB >> 11471605

The value of CT diagnosis of hernia recurrence after prosthetic repair of ventral incisional hernias.

C Gutiérrez de la Peña1, J Vargas Romero, J A Diéguez García.   

Abstract

Herein we present a prospective study made to compare the diagnostic value of a physical examination and a CT scan in the detection of a hernia relapse after carrying out of a intraperitoneal hernioplasty using a non-resorbable mesh. Fifty patients operated on for intraperitoneal hernioplasty with ePTFE mesh and postoperative symptomatology were assessed within a year of the operation via a physical exploration and CT. Each of the patients was subjected to an exploratory laparoscopy for the purpose of confirming the diagnosis. The data were analysed statistically using a chi-square test, sensitivity, specificity, confidence limits, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. The hernia relapse was correctly diagnosed in 98% of cases by CT and in 88% of cases in the physical examination. The sensitivity was 1 in the CT examination and 0.75 in the physical examination, and the specificity results were 0.97 and 0.90, respectively. The positive predictive value in the CT exam was 0.88, whereas in the physical examination it was 0.60. The negative predictive values were 1 and 0.95, respectively. The differences between the values of both methods held a statistical meaning (chi-square test; p < 0.05). The postoperative assessment by CT of symptomatic patients who have been operated on for an intraperitoneal hernioplasty with unabsorbable mesh facilitates carrying out a correct diagnosis in the detection or exclusion of hernial relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11471605     DOI: 10.1007/s003300000743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  7 in total

Review 1.  Complex Ventral Hernias: A Review of Past to Present.

Authors:  Charles N Trujillo; Aaron Fowler; Mohammed H Al-Temimi; Aamna Ali; Samir Johna; Deron Tessier
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2018

2.  SAGES guidelines for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  David Earle; J Scott Roth; Alan Saber; Steve Haggerty; Joel F Bradley; Robert Fanelli; Raymond Price; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Methods of abdominal wall expansion for repair of incisional herniae: a systematic review.

Authors:  N N Alam; S K Narang; S Pathak; I R Daniels; N J Smart
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Comparing different modalities for the diagnosis of incisional hernia: a systematic review.

Authors:  L F Kroese; D Sneiders; G J Kleinrensink; F Muysoms; J F Lange
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing wound COmplications in elective midline laparotomies after FAscia Closure using two different Techniques Of Running sutures: COFACTOR trial.

Authors:  Mohamad Hadi El Charif; Zeina Hassan; Jamal Hoballah; Mohamad Khalife; Eman Sbaity
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 6.  Multidetector CT of expected findings and early postoperative complications after current techniques for ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Massimo Tonolini; Sonia Ippolito
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-05-18

7.  Computed Tomography Verified Prevalence of Incisional Hernia 1 Year Postoperatively after Colorectal Cancer Resection.

Authors:  Niklas Karlsson; Sophia Zackrisson; Pamela Buchwald
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.360

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.