Literature DB >> 11471481

Interpreting the findings of the IMPROVE study.

B L Carter1, D C Malone, S J Billups, R J Valuck, D J Barnette, C D Sintek, S Ellis, D Covey, B Mason, S Jue, J Carmichael, K Guthrie, R Dombrowski, D R Geraets, M Amato.   

Abstract

Various findings of the Impact of Managed Pharmaceutical Care on Resource Utilization and Outcomes in Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (IMPROVE) study are reviewed. Suggestions for future methodologies that will enhance this study are discussed. The IMPROVE study is one of the largest pharmaceutical care studies conducted. Although it was an intervention study that examined global outcomes following management by pharmacists, it was designed as an effectiveness study. Several new practice and research methods were developed, including a method to identify patients at high risk for drug-related problems utilizing pharmacy databases, a method to identify chronic diseases using pharmacy databases, a method to evaluate the structure and process for delivering pharmaceutical care in Veterans Affairs medical centers (VAMCs), and guidelines for providing care to patients in the IMPROVE study. Nine VAMCs participated in the study, and 1054 patients were randomized to either an intervention group (n = 523) or a control group (n = 531). Pharmacists documented a total of 1855 contacts with the intervention group patients and made 3048 therapy-specific interventions over the 12-month study period. There was no meaningful difference in patient satisfaction or quality of life in the two groups. Selected disease-specific indicators found an improved rate of measurement of hemoglobin A1c tests and better control of total and low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in the intervention group compared with the control group. Total health care costs increased in both groups over the 12-month period. The mean increase in costs in the intervention group was $1020, which was lower than the control group's value of $1313. The lessons learned from the IMPROVE study suggest to future investigators how to study and measure the effects of clinical pharmacy services on patient outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11471481     DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/58.14.1330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  13 in total

1.  The role of clinical pharmacist on lipid control in dyslipidemic patients in North of Jordan.

Authors:  Linda Tahaineh; Abla Albsoul-Younes; Eman Al-Ashqar; Ala Habeb
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2011-01-28

2.  Investigation on barriers to pharmaceutical care in community pharmacies: a structural equation model.

Authors:  Gholamhossein Mehralian; Maryam Rangchian; Athar Javadi; Farzad Peiravian
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-08-29

Review 3.  Non-medical prescribing versus medical prescribing for acute and chronic disease management in primary and secondary care.

Authors:  Greg Weeks; Johnson George; Katie Maclure; Derek Stewart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-22

Review 4.  Comparison of drug-related problem risk assessment tools for older adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emmi Puumalainen; Marja Airaksinen; Sanni E Jalava; Timothy F Chen; Maarit Dimitrow
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Improving the transition of highly complex patients into the community: impact of a pharmacist in an allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) outpatient clinic.

Authors:  Ruth Chieng; John Coutsouvelis; Susan Poole; Michael J Dooley; Diana Booth; Andrew Wei
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Pharmacist intervention reduces gastropathy risk in patients using NSAIDs.

Authors:  Victoria Ibañez-Cuevas; Eduardo Lopez-Briz; M Teresa Guardiola-Chorro
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2008-10-19

7.  Potential health implications of racial and ethnic disparities in meeting MTM eligibility criteria.

Authors:  Junling Wang; Yanru Qiao; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Jim Y Wan; Shelley I White-Means; Samuel Dagogo-Jack; William C Cushman
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2013-06-10

Review 8.  Economic Evaluation of Quality Improvement Interventions Designed to Improve Glycemic Control in Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Weighted Regression Analysis.

Authors:  Teryl K Nuckols; Emmett Keeler; Laura J Anderson; Jonas Green; Sally C Morton; Brian J Doyle; Kanaka Shetty; Aziza Arifkhanova; Marika Booth; Roberta Shanman; Paul Shekelle
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 17.152

9.  A randomized controlled trial of team-based care: impact of physician-pharmacist collaboration on uncontrolled hypertension.

Authors:  Jacquelyn S Hunt; Joseph Siemienczuk; Ginger Pape; Yelena Rozenfeld; John MacKay; Benjamin H LeBlanc; Daniel Touchette
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Feasibility of a self-administered survey to identify primary care patients at risk of medication-related problems.

Authors:  Mark J Makowsky; Andrew J Cave; Scot H Simpson
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2014-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.