Literature DB >> 11470903

Reproductive aging and mating: the ticking of the biological clock in female cockroaches.

P J Moore1, A J Moore.   

Abstract

Females are expected to have different mating preferences because of the variation in costs and benefits of mate choice both between females and within individual females over a lifetime. Workers have begun to look for, and find, the expected variation among females in expressed mating preferences. However, variation within females caused by changes in intrinsic influences has not been examined in detail. Here we show that reproductive aging caused by delayed mating resulted in reduced choosiness by female Nauphoeta cinerea, a cockroach that has reproductive cycles and gives live birth. Male willingness to mate was unaffected by variation in female age. Females who were beyond the optimal mating age, 6 days postadult molt, required considerably less courtship than their younger counterparts. Females who were older when they mated had fewer offspring per clutch and fewer clutches than females who mated young. Thus, reduced choosiness was correlated with a permanent reduction in fertility. There was no difference in overall senescence among females, and thus the reduction in clutch size did not result in the expected increased lifespan. We suggest that reproductive aging in N. cinerea, similar to aging in general, occurs because the maintenance of oocytes is costly, and selection is relaxed after the optimal mating period. Our results further suggest that selection for continued choosiness is also relaxed and supports direct selection on female choosiness and a cost to choosiness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11470903      PMCID: PMC55392          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.161154598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

1.  The inheritance of female preference functions in a mate recognition system.

Authors:  M G Ritchie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina.

Authors:  K L Shaw; D P Herlihy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Selection on age at reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster: female mating frequency as a correlated response.

Authors:  C M Sgrò; G Geddes; K Fowler; L Partridge
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Reproductive stage and history affect the phonotactic preferences of female midwife toads, Alytes muletensis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Fisher, Medawar, Hamilton and the evolution of aging.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Mating preference functions of individual female barking treefrogs, Hyla gratiosa, for two properties of male advertisement calls.

Authors:  C G Murphy; H C Gerhardt
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Hypersexual Activity Induced in Females of the Cockroach Nauphoeta cinerea.

Authors:  L M Roth
Journal:  Science       Date:  1962-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Quantitative genetics of female choice in an ultrasonic pyralid moth, Achroia grisella: variation and evolvability of preference along multiple dimensions of the male advertisement signal.

Authors:  Y Jang; M D Greenfield
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Age and experience affect female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  A Kodric-Brown; P F Nicoletto
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 10.  Aging and reproductive potential in women.

Authors:  C Fitzgerald; A E Zimon; E E Jones
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct
View more
  30 in total

1.  Female age and sperm competition: last-male precedence declines as female age increases.

Authors:  Paul D Mack; Nicholas K Priest; Daniel E L Promislow
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Is a decline in offspring quality a necessary consequence of maternal age?

Authors:  Patricia J Moore; W Edwin Harris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Augmented discounting: interaction between ageing and time-preference behaviour.

Authors:  Peter D Sozou; Robert M Seymour
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Reduced fitness in progeny from old parents in a natural population.

Authors:  Julia Schroeder; Shinichi Nakagawa; Mark Rees; Maria-Elena Mannarelli; Terry Burke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evidence that fertility trades off with early offspring fitness as males age.

Authors:  Sheri L Johnson; Sylvia Zellhuber-McMillan; Joanne Gillum; Jessica Dunleavy; Jonathan P Evans; Shinichi Nakagawa; Neil J Gemmell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Development time mediates the effect of larval diet on ageing and mating success of male antler flies in the wild.

Authors:  Christopher S Angell; Mathieu J Oudin; Nicolas O Rode; Brian S Mautz; Russell Bonduriansky; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Hormonal state influences aspects of female mate choice in the Túngara Frog (Physalaemus pustulosus).

Authors:  Kathleen S Lynch; David Crews; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 8.  Female sexual arousal in amphibians.

Authors:  Walter Wilczynski; Kathleen S Lynch
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.587

9.  Strategic adjustment of begging effort by banded mongoose pups.

Authors:  Matthew B V Bell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Parasitoid infestation changes female mating preferences.

Authors:  Oliver M Beckers; William E Wagner
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.