Literature DB >> 11470501

Prey catching in the archer fish: angles and probability of hitting an aerial target.

P J.A. Timmermans1.   

Abstract

When trying to squirt down aerial arthropods, archer fishes (Toxotidae) have to cope with the displacement of the image of the target by refraction of light at the water surface. It has been suggested, and accepted, that Toxotes jaculatrix would avoid the effect of refraction by squirting vertically. In our previous study, however, Toxotes chatareus was observed to squirt under a wide range of angles, including angles much smaller than 90 degrees. The aim of the present study was to asses in T. chatareus (N=15), the frequency distribution of angles used, the relation between angle and probability to hit, the relation between target height and angle, and the smallest angles the fishes can use. The outcome was a distribution with a range of 102-58 degrees and a median of 74 degrees, no relation between angle and probability to hit, no relation between target height and angle and a smallest angle of 45 degrees. The results clearly indicate that T. chatareus does not evade the refraction effect by squirting only vertically (90 degrees ), but masters a considerable refraction effect thanks to a mechanism that is not investigated here. The capacity to hit prey under a wide range of angles is seen as an important adaptation to the natural habitat where the visibility of prey is restricted by vegetation. The constraints of the range of angles are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11470501     DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(01)00172-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  6 in total

1.  A spitting image: specializations in archerfish eyes for vision at the interface between air and water.

Authors:  Shelby Temple; Nathan S Hart; N Justin Marshall; Shaun P Collin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Target tracking during venom 'spitting' by cobras.

Authors:  Guido Westhoff; Melissa Boetig; Horst Bleckmann; Bruce A Young
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 3.  Selective attention without a neocortex.

Authors:  Richard J Krauzlis; Amarender R Bogadhi; James P Herman; Anil Bollimunta
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Population growth, trophic level, and reproductive biology of two congeneric archer fishes (Toxotes chatareus, Hamilton 1822 and Toxotes jaculatrix, Pallas 1767) inhabiting Malaysian coastal waters.

Authors:  K D Simon; Y Bakar; A Samat; C C Zaidi; A Aziz; A G Mazlan
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Endogenous orienting in the archer fish.

Authors:  William Saban; Liora Sekely; Raymond M Klein; Shai Gabay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Concept learning and the use of three common psychophysical paradigms in the archerfish (Toxotes chatareus).

Authors:  Cait Newport; Guy Wallis; Ulrike E Siebeck
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.492

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.