Literature DB >> 11470396

The association between exposure to a rear-end collision and future health complaints.

A Berglund1, L Alfredsson, I Jensen, J D Cassidy, A Nygren.   

Abstract

Different symptoms, together with neck pain, have been attributed to persons with persistent complaints after a previous motor vehicle crash (MVC) and are sometimes referred to as the "late whiplash syndrome." A cohort study was conducted to determine whether exposure to a rear-end collision, with or without whiplash injury, is associated with future health complaints. The results regarding future neck or shoulder pain have previously been described, and the objective of the present report was to focus on outcomes other than neck pain. Included in the study were persons 18 to 65 years of age and covered by traffic insurance at one of the largest insurance companies in Sweden. Claim reports were collected from the period November 1987 to April 1988. Drivers exposed to a rear-end collision were divided into two subgroups: those with reported whiplash injury (n = 232) and those without reported whiplash injury (n = 204). For comparison, 3688 subjects who were unexposed to MVCs were selected, with consideration taken to the age and gender distribution in the exposed subgroups. The prevalence of different health complaints among the study subjects was estimated according to a mailed questionnaire at follow-up in 1994, 7 years after the rear-end collision. When exposed subjects with whiplash injury were compared to unexposed subjects, increased relative risks in the range of 1.6-3.7 were seen for headache, thoracic and low back pain, as well as for fatigue, sleep disturbances and ill health. No corresponding increased risks were found among the exposed subjects without reported whiplash injury. We conclude that rear-end collisions resulting in reported whiplash injuries seem to have a substantial impact on health complaints, even a long time after the collision. There is a need to identify factors that predict a non-favorable outcome in order to improve clinical management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11470396     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00369-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  18 in total

1.  Axial head rotation increases facet joint capsular ligament strains in automotive rear impact.

Authors:  Steven G Storvik; Brian D Stemper
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Symptom profile of persons self-reporting whiplash: a Norwegian population-based study (HUNT 2).

Authors:  Hanne Gro Wenzel; Arnstein Mykletun; Tom Ivar Lund Nilsen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Whiplash associated disorders: a review of the literature to guide patient information and advice.

Authors:  T McClune; A K Burton; G Waddell
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Factors related to non-recovery from whiplash. The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT).

Authors:  Solbjørg Makalani Myrtveit; Jens Christoffer Skogen; Keith J Petrie; Ingvard Wilhelmsen; Hanne Gro Wenzel; Børge Sivertsen
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-06

5.  Whiplash injuries in Finland: the situation 3 years later.

Authors:  Timo Miettinen; Eeva Leino; Olavi Airaksinen; Karl-August Lindgren
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Neck pain and disability following motor vehicle accidents--a cohort study.

Authors:  Lina Bunketorp; E Stener-Victorin; J Carlsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Neck pain and disability due to neck pain: what is the relation?

Authors:  René Fejer; Jan Hartvigsen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Pain distribution and predictors of widespread pain in the immediate aftermath of motor vehicle collision.

Authors:  A V Bortsov; T F Platts-Mills; D A Peak; J S Jones; R A Swor; R M Domeier; D C Lee; N K Rathlev; P L Hendry; R B Fillingim; S A McLean
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 3.931

9.  Neither the WAD-classification nor the Quebec Task Force follow-up regimen seems to be important for the outcome after a whiplash injury. A prospective study on 186 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Jouko Kivioja; Irene Jensen; Urban Lindgren
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Protocol of a randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of physician education and activation versus two rehabilitation programs for the treatment of Whiplash-associated Disorders: The University Health Network Whiplash Intervention Trial.

Authors:  Pierre Côté; J David Cassidy; Simon Carette; Eleanor Boyle; Heather M Shearer; Maja Stupar; Carlo Ammendolia; Gabrielle van der Velde; Jill A Hayden; Xiaoqing Yang; Maurits van Tulder; John W Frank
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.