Literature DB >> 11470185

Auditory evoked responses in control subjects and in patients with problem-tinnitus.

G M Gerken1, P S Hesse, J J Wiorkowski.   

Abstract

Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and middle latency responses (MLRs) recorded from problem-tinnitus patients were compared with responses from normal hearing, hearing loss, and elderly subjects. Ten stimulus frequencies were presented in counterbalanced sequence and all frequencies were presented before any given frequency was presented again. The variables of importance were problem-tinnitus, hearing loss, subject age and stimulus frequency. Repeated measures analysis of variance showed a significant difference only in the latency of ABR wave 7. The intrinsically high variability in the problem-tinnitus and elderly groups rendered standard statistical analyses ineffective with the sample sizes used. Alternative analyses were employed in which the MLR waves of the normal hearing subjects were taken as the standard against which the other groups were compared. Very large MLR waves occurred in some, but not all, of the subjects in the problem-tinnitus and elderly groups. Different MLR waves were large in different subjects without correspondingly large ABR potentials. These results suggest: (1) selective alteration of MLR generators in different forms of tinnitus; and (2) differing effects of age on auditory physiology. Stimulus frequency and hearing loss contributed to this multivariate picture. Another variable, the average sound pressure level of the long-term acoustic environment, may also be important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11470185     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(01)00277-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  13 in total

Review 1.  Underlying mechanisms of tinnitus: review and clinical implications.

Authors:  James A Henry; Larry E Roberts; Donald M Caspary; Sarah M Theodoroff; Richard J Salvi
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Assessing audiological, pathophysiological and psychological variables in tinnitus patients with or without hearing loss.

Authors:  Francesco Martines; Daniela Bentivegna; Enrico Martines; Vincenzo Sciacca; Gioacchino Martinciglio
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Towards a Mechanistic-Driven Precision Medicine Approach for Tinnitus.

Authors:  Thanos Tzounopoulos; Carey Balaban; Lori Zitelli; Catherine Palmer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-01

4.  Tinnitus with or without hearing loss: are its characteristics different?

Authors:  Marina Savastano
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Gap prepulse inhibition and auditory brainstem-evoked potentials as objective measures for tinnitus in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Susanne Dehmel; Daniel Eisinger; Susan E Shore
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-31

6.  Middle Latency Auditory Evoked Potential (MLAEP) in Workers with and without Tinnitus who are Exposed to Occupational Noise.

Authors:  Valdete Alves Valentins dos Santos Filha; Alessandra Giannella Samelli; Carla Gentile Matas
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-09-11

7.  Correlation of tinnitus loudness and onset duration with audiological profile indicating variation in prognosis.

Authors:  Sunita Gudwani; Sanjay K Munjal; Naresh K Panda; Roshan K Verma
Journal:  ISRN Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-02

8.  Noise-induced tinnitus: auditory evoked potential in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Valdete Alves Valentins dos Santos-Filha; Alessandra Giannella Samelli; Carla Gentile Matas
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 9.  Sensorineural Tinnitus: Its Pathology and Probable Therapies.

Authors:  Aage R Møller
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-08

Review 10.  Auditory Brainstem Responses in Tinnitus: A Review of Who, How, and What?

Authors:  Victoria Milloy; Philippe Fournier; Daniel Benoit; Arnaud Noreña; Amineh Koravand
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.