Literature DB >> 11469803

Mechanism of monoterpene cyclization: stereochemical aspects of the transformation of noncyclizable substrate analogs by recombinant (-)-limonene synthase, (+)-bornyl diphosphate synthase, and (-)-pinene synthase.

W Schwab1, D C Williams, E M Davis, R Croteau.   

Abstract

The tightly coupled nature of the reaction sequence catalyzed by monoterpene synthases has prevented direct observation of the topologically required isomerization step leading from geranyl diphosphate to the presumptive, enzyme-bound, tertiary allylic intermediate linalyl diphosphate, which ultimately cyclizes to the various monoterpene skeletons. Previous experimental approaches using the noncyclizable substrate analogs 6,7-dihydrogeranyl diphosphate and racemic methanogeranyl diphosphate, in attempts to dissect the cryptic isomerization step from the normally coupled reaction sequence, were thwarted by the limited product available from native monoterpene synthases and by the inability to resolve chiral monoterpene products at the microscale. These approaches were revisited using three recombinant monoterpene synthases and chiral phase capillary gas chromatographic methods to separate antipodal products of the substrate analogs. The recombinant monoterpene olefin synthases, (-)-limonene synthase from spearmint and (-)-pinene synthase from grand fir, yielded essentially only achiral, olefin products (corresponding to the respective analogs and homologs of myrcene, trans-ocimene and cis-ocimene) from 6,7-dihydrogeranyl diphosphate and (2S,3R)-methanogeranyl diphosphate; no significant amounts of terpenols or homoterpenols were formed, nor was direct evidence obtained for the formation of the anticipated analog and homolog of the tertiary intermediate linalyl diphosphate (i.e., 6,7-dihydrolinalyl diphosphate and homolinalyl diphosphate, respectively). In the case of recombinant (+)-bornyl diphosphate synthase from common sage, the achiral olefins were generated, as before, from 6,7-dihydrogeranyl diphosphate and (2R,3S)-methanogeranyl diphosphate, but 6,7-dihydrolinalool and homolinalool also comprised significant components of the respective product mixtures, indicating greater access of water to the active site of this enzyme compared to the olefin synthases; again, no direct evidence for the production of 6,7-dihydrolinalyl diphosphate or homolinalyl diphosphate was obtained. Resolution of the terpenol products of (+)-bornyl diphosphate synthase, by chiral phase separation, revealed the predominant formation of (3R)-dihydrolinalool from dihydrogeranyl diphosphate and of (4S)-homolinalool from (2R,3S)-methanogeranyl diphosphate. The opposite stereochemistries of these products indicates water trapping from opposite faces of the corresponding tertiary carbocationic intermediates of the respective reactions, a phenomenon that appears to result from the binding conformations of these substrate analogs. Although these experiments failed to provide direct evidence for the tertiary intermediate of the tightly coupled isomerization-cyclization sequence, they did reveal a mechanistic difference between the olefin synthases and bornyl diphosphate synthase involving access of water as a participant in the reaction. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11469803     DOI: 10.1006/abbi.2001.2442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys        ISSN: 0003-9861            Impact factor:   4.013


  14 in total

Review 1.  Molecular scaffolds for chemical wizardry: learning nature's rules for terpene cyclases.

Authors:  B Greenhagen; J Chappell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Bornyl diphosphate synthase: structure and strategy for carbocation manipulation by a terpenoid cyclase.

Authors:  Douglas A Whittington; Mitchell L Wise; Marek Urbansky; Robert M Coates; Rodney B Croteau; David W Christianson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Surrogate splicing for functional analysis of sesquiterpene synthase genes.

Authors:  Shuiqin Wu; Mark A Schoenbeck; Bryan T Greenhagen; Shunji Takahashi; Sungbeom Lee; Robert M Coates; Joseph Chappell
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 4.  Enantiomeric natural products: occurrence and biogenesis.

Authors:  Jennifer M Finefield; David H Sherman; Martin Kreitman; Robert M Williams
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Functional and Structural Characterization of a (+)-Limonene Synthase from Citrus sinensis.

Authors:  Benjamin R Morehouse; Ramasamy P Kumar; Jason O Matos; Sarah Naomi Olsen; Sonya Entova; Daniel D Oprian
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Sesquiterpene synthases Cop4 and Cop6 from Coprinus cinereus: catalytic promiscuity and cyclization of farnesyl pyrophosphate geometric isomers.

Authors:  Fernando Lopez-Gallego; Sean A Agger; Daniel Abate-Pella; Mark D Distefano; Claudia Schmidt-Dannert
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 3.164

7.  Inhibition of monoterpene cyclases by inert analogues of geranyl diphosphate and linalyl diphosphate.

Authors:  Frank Karp; Yuxin Zhao; Bindu Santhamma; Bryce Assink; Robert M Coates; Rodney B Croteau
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 4.013

8.  Isolation and Characterization of Three New Monoterpene Synthases from Artemisia annua.

Authors:  Ju-Xin Ruan; Jian-Xu Li; Xin Fang; Ling-Jian Wang; Wen-Li Hu; Xiao-Ya Chen; Chang-Qing Yang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Tomato linalool synthase is induced in trichomes by jasmonic acid.

Authors:  Chris C N van Schie; Michel A Haring; Robert C Schuurink
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 4.076

10.  Defining the Product Chemical Space of Monoterpenoid Synthases.

Authors:  Boxue Tian; C Dale Poulter; Matthew P Jacobson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.