Literature DB >> 11469731

Nonorganic pain drawings are associated with low psychological scores on the preoperative SF-36 questionnaire in patients with chronic low back pain.

B Dahl1, P M Gehrchen, T Kiaer, P Blyme, E Tøndevold, T Bendix.   

Abstract

The Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) measures general health and well-being. Within the last 5 years it has been used increasingly to characterise patients in the medical literature. Relatively few studies have used the SF-36 on patients with chronic low back pain undergoing preoperative evaluation, but results suggest that it may be predictive of surgical outcome. Pain drawings are a routine part of evaluation prior to spinal surgery in several centres, since their classification of organic or nonorganic has been shown in some studies to correlate well with psychological characteristics predicting poor outcome. The purpose of the present study was to assess possible correlations between nonorganic pain drawings and the psychological scales in the SF-36. We included 128 patients in the study, all of them referred from other hospitals. Previous spinal surgery had been undergone by 25%, and 59% required daily medication because of low back pain. All patients completed pain drawings using predefined symbols These pain drawings were scored dichotomously as organic or nonorganic based on a brief description of a typical nonorganic characteristics. Patients also completed the Danish version of the SF-36 questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using logistic regression analysis. The pain drawing classification was used as the dependent variable and scores on the eight scales of the SF-36 as independent variables. P values of <0.05 were considered significant. The mean scores of the patient population on all eight scales were significantly lower than Danish norms. The only scales that correlated with the presence of nonorganic pain drawings were emotional role (RE) and mental health (MH), both measuring psychological health. The odds ratio (OR) of receiving a nonorganic pain drawing was 22 (95% confidence interval, or CI, 7-65) if the scores on RE and MH were more than 2 standard deviations (SD) below the Danish norm. This is the first study providing evidence that pain drawing ratings are influenced by the psychological scales of the SF-36. The clinical relevance of this observation regarding prediction of outcome after spinal surgery should be assessed in future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11469731      PMCID: PMC3611502          DOI: 10.1007/s005860100266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  9 in total

1.  Pain 5 years after instrumented and non-instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Thomas Andersen; Finn B Christensen; Ebbe S Hansen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Validity of pain drawings for predicting psychological status outcome in patients with recurrent or chronic low back pain.

Authors:  J H Abbott; Megan Foster; Lucien Hamilton; Michael Ravenwood; Nicholas Tan
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-02

3.  Evaluation of health-related quality of life in patients candidate for spine and other musculoskeletal surgery.

Authors:  José Antonio Becerra Fontal; Joan Bagó Granell; Josep Garré Olmo; Ramón Roig Busquets; Francisco Peris Prats; Carlos Villanueva Leal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Computer-aided surface estimation of pain drawings - intra- and inter-rater reliability.

Authors:  Ann L Persson; Sofia Garametsos; Jonna Pedersen
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Anxiety and depression affect pain drawings in cervical degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Anna MacDowall; Yohan Robinson; Martin Skeppholm; Claes Olerud
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.384

6.  Assessment of health-related quality of life and patient's knowledge in chronic non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Melinda Járomi; Brigitta Szilágyi; Anita Velényi; Eleonóra Leidecker; Bence László Raposa; Márta Hock; Petra Baumann; Pongrác Ács; Alexandra Makai
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: clinical and quality of life outcomes with a minimum 2 year follow-up.

Authors:  Chan Wb Peng; William Yeo; Seang B Tan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Predictive factors for the outcome of multidisciplinary treatments in chronic low back pain at the first multidisciplinary pain center of Japan.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Hayashi; Young-Chang P Arai; Tatsunori Ikemoto; Makoto Nishihara; Shigeyuki Suzuki; Tomoe Hirakawa; Shingo Matsuo; Mami Kobayashi; Midori Haruta; Yuka Kawabata; Hiroki Togo; Taiji Noguchi; Toshiyuki Hase; Genki Hatano; Takahiro Ushida
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-09-30

9.  The association between pain diagram area, fear-avoidance beliefs, and pain catastrophising.

Authors:  Bruce F Walker; Christine D Losco; Anthony Armson; Amanda Meyer; Norman J Stomski
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2014-01-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.