Literature DB >> 11469520

Antinuclear antibody screening in this new millennium: farewell to the microscope?

H Nossent1, O P Rekvig.   

Abstract

ANA testing by immunofluorescence technique (F-ANA) is nowadays still performed in much the same way as 45 years ago when the test was introduced. Due to its low specificity the F-ANA test has a poor predictive value for systemic autoimmune diseases and in addition has proven difficult to standardise. In the meantime, many of the nuclear and cytoplasmatic auto-antigens, related to specific types of autoimmune disease, have been characterised and can be tested for in specific ELISA assays (E-ANA). These assays are in large part automated and enable the large volume testing required, by the current attitude, to use ANA-testing for its high negative predictive value in the exclusion of systemic autoimmune disease. In addition, E-ANA assays give specific results for clinically relevant autoantibodies, while its test repertoire can be altered at any given time to reflect changes in current thinking on relevant auto-antigens. Thus, we suggest that the unspecific F-ANA test should no longer be considered the gold standard for the detection of clinically relevant autoantibodies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11469520     DOI: 10.1080/030097401300162860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0300-9742            Impact factor:   3.641


  7 in total

1.  How should a district general hospital immunology service screen for anti-nuclear antibodies? An 'in-the-field' audit.

Authors:  R Hira-Kazal; P Shea-Simonds; J L Peacock; J Maher
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Antinuclear antibodies measured by enzyme immunoassay in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: relation to disease activity.

Authors:  Ehud Paz; Muhammed Adawi; Idit Lavi; Yehuda Mussel; Reuven Mader
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Alpha-actinin-binding antibodies in relation to systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis.

Authors:  Andrea Becker-Merok; Manar Kalaaji; Kaia Haugbro; Cathrin Nikolaisen; Kirsten Nilsen; Ole Petter Rekvig; Johannes C Nossent
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 4.  Current concepts and future directions for the assessment of autoantibodies to cellular antigens referred to as anti-nuclear antibodies.

Authors:  Michael Mahler; Pier-Luigi Meroni; Xavier Bossuyt; Marvin J Fritzler
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 4.818

Review 5.  Emerging technologies in autoantibody testing for rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Nancy J Olsen; May Y Choi; Marvin J Fritzler
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 5.156

6.  Chemiluminescent immunoassay technology: what does it change in autoantibody detection?

Authors:  Luigi Cinquanta; Desré Ethel Fontana; Nicola Bizzaro
Journal:  Auto Immun Highlights       Date:  2017-06-24

7.  A comparison of anti-nuclear antibody quantification using automated enzyme immunoassays and immunofluorescence assays.

Authors:  Renata Baronaite; Merete Engelhart; Troels Mørk Hansen; Gorm Thamsborg; Hanne Slott Jensen; Steen Stender; Pal Bela Szecsi
Journal:  Autoimmune Dis       Date:  2014-01-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.