Literature DB >> 11468458

Trauma outcome analysis of a Jakarta University Hospital using the TRISS method: validation and limitation in comparison with the major trauma outcome study. Trauma and Injury Severity Score.

P Joosse1, S Soedarmo, J S Luitse, K J Ponsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this prospective study, the TRISS methodology is used to compare trauma care at a University Hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia, with the standards reported in the Major Trauma Outcome Study (MTOS).
METHODS: Between February 24, 1999, and July 1, 1999, all consecutive patients with multiple and severe trauma were included in the study (n = 105). Survival analysis was completed for 97 (92%) patients.
RESULTS: The majority of patients were men (81%), and the average age was 28 years. Ninety-five patients (98%) sustained blunt trauma, with motor vehicle crashes being the most common (68%). The predicted mortality was 14% and the observed mortality was 29%. The Z and M statistics were 7.87 and 0.843, respectively.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that in developing countries both institution-bound factors and specific limitations in the TRISS methodology are responsible for the difference between predicted and observed mortality, indicating the need for a regional database.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11468458     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200107000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  8 in total

Review 1.  Prehospital care in Indonesia.

Authors:  E Pitt; A Pusponegoro
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Is the Kampala trauma score an effective predictor of mortality in low-resource settings? A comparison of multiple trauma severity scores.

Authors:  Sharon R Weeks; Catherine J Juillard; Martin E Monono; Georges A Etoundi; Marquise K Ngamby; Adnan A Hyder; Kent A Stevens
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Analysis of Trauma Outcome Using the TRISS Method at a Tertiary Care Centre in Pune.

Authors:  Vikram U Deshmukh; Mrunal N Ketkar; Erach K Bharucha
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  The prognostic importance of trauma scoring systems in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Adnan Narci; Okan Solak; Nurten Turhan-Haktanir; Abdullah Ayçiçek; Yavuz Demir; Yüksel Ela; Evrim Ozkaraca; Yüksel Terzi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Burden of traumatic injuries in Saudi Arabia: lessons from a major trauma registry in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Suliman Alghnam; Muhamad Alkelya; Khalid Al-Bedah; Saleem Al-Enazi
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

6.  Thefeasibility, appropriateness, and applicability of trauma scoring systems in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Isabelle Feldhaus; Melissa Carvalho; Ghazel Waiz; Joel Igu; Zachary Matthay; Rochelle Dicker; Catherine Juillard
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2020-05-06

7.  Evaluation of trauma care using TRISS method: the role of adjusted misclassification rate and adjusted w-statistic.

Authors:  Sadik S Llullaku; Nexhmi Sh Hyseni; Cen I Bytyçi; Sylejman K Rexhepi
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  The new trauma score (NTS): a modification of the revised trauma score for better trauma mortality prediction.

Authors:  Jin Hee Jeong; Yong Joo Park; Dong Hoon Kim; Tae Yun Kim; Changwoo Kang; Soo Hoon Lee; Sang Bong Lee; Seong Chun Kim; Daesung Lim
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.